Portelli insists court decision on illegal penthouses is just ‘an interpretation’ of the law

Developer Joseph Portelli considers the Court of Appeal’s decision to declare a row of penthouses he built in Sannat illegal as just “a different interpretation” of the law, defending the Planning Authority’s decision to ignore the ruling.

Referring to his Qala ODZ pools, which were part of a mega project and declared illegal by the Court of Appeal, Portelli insisted in a letter to the editor published by The Times of Malta that they were not given electrical and water meters. Instead, he said, the pools were through “a temporary meter” provided by Enemalta.

According to current rules, water and electricity should only be supplied to legally built buildings once an architect presents a compliance certificate to the authorities.

This did not happen in Portelli’s case, as his pools were illegal, but he was still given electricity to operate them. Despite his illegalities, Portelli’s pools are still connected to the grid and powered by Enemalta.

It is unclear how long the “temporary supply” will last.

Criticising columnist Kevin Cassar for calling his row of penthouses in Sannat illegal, Portelli said that it was not true that the court declared them illegal and that they should be dismantled. Yet the court’s decision is unequivocal. It ordered the permits revoked.

“The court simply gave a different interpretation to how the Planning Authority is interpreting penthouse policies,” Portelli insisted.

He added: “The Planning Authority has continued to interpret this same policy in the way it did for our permit,” showing the Authority ignored the ruling by the country’s highest court.

In his ruling last March, Chief Justice Mark Chetcuti declared the Sannat penthouses and two mega pools in ODZ land next to them were issued an irregular permit by the Planning Authority. The court revoked the permit. This was a final ruling, and no further appeals are possible.

The Planning Authority has not issued an enforcement order against the illegally built penthouses and pools.

Enemalta did not reply to questions to justify its decision.

The illegal buildings in Sannat and Qala were built by Excel Investments Ltd, owned by the trio Joseph Portelli, Mark Agius, known as Ta’ Dirjanu, and Daniel Refalo.

                           

Sign up to our newsletter

Stay in the know

Get special updates directly in your inbox
Don't worry we do not spam
                           
                               
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KLAUS
KLAUS
4 hours ago

We don’t need any justice in Malta.
The new law and order is now called JOSEPH PORTELLI.

This with such nonsense our government is again dismayingly silent, but it also shows the dependence of these special kind of politicians.

Is there anyone here who still thinks that Malta is a democracy?

Last edited 4 hours ago by KLAUS
Joseph Tabone Adami
Joseph Tabone Adami
2 hours ago
Reply to  KLAUS

The great law-giver Hammurabi come to life.

Edward Sabt
Edward Sabt
4 hours ago

Personally I believe Prof Cassar and none of the others.

Raymond Farrugia
Raymond Farrugia
2 hours ago

So now we don’t need laws and lawcourts because theirs is just an interpretation of the law; a differing point of view! How silly!

Karmenu Psaila
Karmenu Psaila
2 hours ago

Once in Hong Kong there was a case like this because the contractor had built an extra floor that was illegal in a block of 30 floors , so the court ruled that one floor has to go down , and it has to be the second floor that must go down , and that gave a lesson to all contractors so it won’t repeat itself.

Donald Caligari
Donald Caligari
2 hours ago

Dan hasibna bolloh bhalu. Il-qorti qatata li illegali. Biex gej dan il buffu?
ILLEGALI, Portelli. Issa narraw il prim ministru sej jaghmel ????

Donald Caligari
Donald Caligari
2 hours ago

Dear Prime minister for the every day citizen an application relating to minor amendments is overdue by 90 days ,
But Portelli Blatantly interprets the Law together with PA and gets away with illegal pent houses ,
I ask you as my prime minister to interpret the Judgement and let us know what your interpretation is…

Caroline Muscat
Admin
5 minutes ago

The prime minister does not interpret a court ruling, just as much as Joseph Portelli doesn’t. This is a decision by the Chief Justice.

Related Stories

Government subsidising illegal use of car park by Christian Borg in St Lucija
The government, through its agency SportMalta, is subsidising a
Campaign urges total transparency on unnatural death cases
Isabelle Bonnici, the mother of Jean Paul Sofia, who

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo