Appeals Court rules all EU citizens can submit FOI requests to the government

Home Affairs Ministry had denied Access Info’s FOI on migrant returns


In a landmark ruling, Malta’s Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of NGO Access Info’s contention that the Maltese government was discriminatory and violated the rights of EU citizens when it refused to register a freedom information request from a non-Maltese citizen.

The issue at stake dates back to an August 2019 request from an Italian citizen working with Access Info requesting data on the government’s return of irregular migrants.

The Ministry of Home Affairs and National Security had refused to register the request with the excuse that an “eligible person” under Malta’s 2008 Freedom of Information Act had to either be a Maltese citizen or a citizen of an EU member state who has been resident in Malta for a minimum of five years.

Access Info appealed the decision with the pro bono assistance of pro bono representation of Fenech Farrugia Fiott Legal and argued the law’s residency and citizenship requirements contravene international standards and European law.

Moreover, it was argued before the courts that the clauses are tantamount to discrimination and violate Malta’s constitutional obligation to protect the right to freedom of expression and information.

Malta’s Information and Data Protection Appeals Tribunal in March 2022 found in Access Info’s favour but the Ministry appealed the ruling.

The Court of Appeal has now confirmed that it was not the intention of the legislator to restrict the right to submit a request on the grounds of residency and therefore create a law that was out of line with the laws of other EU member states and that, as such, there was a breach of Malta’s obligations under EU law.

The Court noted that the Ministry’s strict interpretation of the law would make it practically impossible for anyone not living in Malta to submit a request, which was discriminatory and directly impacted not only the right to freedom of information, but also the freedom of movement of EU citizens.

In a statement on the landmark ruling. Access Info Executive Director Helen Darbishire said, “This win establishes an important principle of the right of all to request information without discrimination, and will support transnational investigations by journalists and civil society across Europe.”

Dr Paul Felice of Fenech Farrugia Fiott Legal added, “We are very pleased that Malta’s Court of Appeal has finally put to rest a matter of public interest significance which now confirms, without any shadow of doubt, that EU citizens have a right to access and receive information from government agencies under the Freedom of Information Act, irrespective of their residence.

“This judgment should enhance the standards of transparency which the Act was designed to safeguard and promote.”

The NGO had asked for information as to whether the returns were national or joint, voluntary assisted, a readmission or forced operation, destination and date, a breakdown of gender, age and country of origin of the returned migrants, and the total cost. It also asked for a list of all agreements that Malta made to return migrants to third countries – including informal agreements.

The subject of agreements related to migration has always been a sensitive one in Malta. Neville Gafa – a former official in the Office of the Prime Minister – had spoken about the deal he has brokered with the Libyan authorities to prevent migrants arriving in Malta.

Access Info said it will be resubmitting its original freedom of information request.

The NGO added, “The Court decision comes at a time when standards of freedom of expression and information in Malta have come under scrutiny, both by international bodies and by local journalists and civil society.”

In fact, in what is being described in legal terms as a 40-strong SLAPP against The Shift, the government is battling 40 freedom of information requests, apparently adamant on crippling financially the small independent newsroom with continuous and lengthy legal battles.

The information that the government is going to extraordinary lengths to withhold concerns how public funds are being used to fund the operations of MaltaToday and Saviour Balzan’s private businesses, particularly the public relations consultancies offered to different ministries.

Headed by lawyer Anna Mallia, the Information and Data Protection Appeals Tribunal recently threw out yet another round of challenges against releasing such information.

In total, 40 government ministries and agencies are refusing to abide by the decision of the Data Protection Commissioner to release the information, taking the cases to the Appeals Tribunal.

So far, Chair Anna Mallia has so far dismissed 25 of those cases, which has led the government entities to file second appeals, this time in court, where The Shift is so far facing another 17 cases before Judge Lawrence Mintoff.


Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 month ago

One might expect the PL govt to find another way to deal with that court decision and that means to either cirumvent it or stay refusing what they are now even by court decision obliged to do.

Apart from that, the PL has more than just a problem in its relationship with the media outside the PL realm, that article also points out that the Constitution of the Republic of Malta which the government is by the very regulations in it obliged to follow, is also always regarded as an obstacle to let the PL govt rule as it pleases and not as the consitution and the laws of Malta demand.

Those lawsuits against The Shift News are just farce with a very bad taste and for every righteous person it merely shows and proves that the PL is not fit for government as it should be.

It has become evident by all the media reports and the way the PL govt acts itself, that when there is no supervison on them by higher authorities, or institutions like the EU of which Malta is a member state, that puts pressure on this government, nothing goes in accordance with the law. The worst thing to top it all is watching the PL ignoring court decisions made by the highest level of the judiciary of Malta itself.

If the PL had at least a minimum of decency left, they would drop the lawsuits against The Shift News immediately.

Godfrey Leone Ganado
Godfrey Leone Ganado
1 month ago

They can run ‘b-saqajhom wara patatthom’, but they may never hide’.
This saying was thrown at Joseph Muscat in the European Parliament after a marathon of lies.
While we are eager to see the political crooks walking hadcuffed into a prison cell, we can wait for this to really happen, and happen it will. Tighten your seat belts Joseph and Michelle.
In the meantime Robert Abela, stay in the queue.

1 month ago

What I will never understand is how one can be charged 40 times by the government for a justifiable release of information.

Many of these cases have already been won by THE SHIFT NEWS.
Some are still pending to be won.

These many useless lawsuits are no different than being charged with a crime 40 times: Once acquitted, that’s it. That’s it!

I can’t just come along and keep filing more stupid lawsuits.

The fact that the court accepted them at all is so shameful for Malta and this so-called ‘Government’.

Related Stories

REVEALED: Rosianne’s contract with ITS… it’s not quite what she told Yorgen
Tista’ taqra dan l-artiklu bil-Malti Labour MP Rosianne Cutajar started
€400 million incinerator negotiations to start soon with project three years late
The five consortia competing for a €400 million waste-to-energy

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo