Justice Minister Jonathan Attard is refusing to provide details about an ongoing international court case filed in 2021 by Ali Sadr, the owner of the notorious Pilatus Bank, which was closed by the European Central Bank (ECB) after years of alleged money laundering activities in Malta.
The Shift has learned that, despite the case being before the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) for four years, there has been little real progress.
Ali Sadr filed the case shortly after the conclusions of a magisterial inquiry in 2021, which recommended charging him in Malta for money laundering offences.
As a result of his ICSID filing, both the Malta Police and the Attorney General decided to postpone arraigning Ali Sadr until the international case was resolved. According to recent data published in the Government Gazette, Malta paid over €140,000 in court expenses related to this case last year.
Inquiries made by The Shift regarding the potential timeline for concluding the case, the present state of affairs, and the likelihood of charges against Ali Sadr in Malta were met with silence from Minister Attard.
Limited information available on the ICSID portal indicates that the case, Alpene vs the Republic of Malta, is still ongoing. Earlier this month, both Malta and Alpene (the company associated with Ali Sadr) filed their latest observations in the case.
The Shift revealed in 2022 that Ali Sadr had filed a case before the ICSID, an investor-state dispute settlement body. He is seeking damages and claims loss of earnings due to the closure of Pilatus Bank. Sadr has also requested that any legal action planned against him in Malta be suspended.
The ICSID recommended suspending all proceedings against Ali Sadr by Malta pending a decision on the case. Recommendations from the ICSID are recognised as binding in the international community.
Using a Hong Kong-based company, Alpene Ltd, Ali Sadr argued that threats of criminal prosecution against him constitute harassment and that the liquidation of Pilatus Bank violated his rights. He claims that Malta breached a 2009 bilateral treaty with China, which addresses the arbitration of disputes between states and investors.
In 2022, an EU Court dismissed an attempt by Pilatus Bank to regain its banking licence, which Malta revoked in 2018, following a decision by the European Central Bank. Additionally, Ali Sadr’s Pilatus Bank was fined a record €4.9 million by Malta’s anti-money laundering unit for “serious and systemic failure” to adhere to anti-money laundering laws.
A magisterial inquiry, which identified Ali Sadr among those responsible for alleged money laundering at the bank, has called for his criminal prosecution, along with other foreign directors, none of whom currently reside in Malta.
Although the bank itself and its former anti-money laundering officer, Claude-Ann Sant Fournier, were charged in 2021, none of the bank’s high-ranking officials have been extradited to Malta to face prosecution.
Ali Sadr is suspected of knowingly facilitating his bank’s clients in transferring, converting, and concealing the proceeds of crime, according to the findings of the inquiry.
The magisterial inquiry, which cost taxpayers €7.5 million, was concluded in December 2020.
Sign up to our newsletter Stay in the know
"*" indicates required fields
Tags
#Ali Sadr
#Jonathan Attard
#Malta police
#money laundering
#Pilatus Bank
#World Bank
I think the authorities have a vested interest in the case remaing pending. L omerata tal Mafja.
What about criminal proceedings being time-barred five years on?
Watch this space. This is the case that will crack the mask wide open. The Attorney General will fall, and if she’s propped up any longer, the weight will bring the government crashing down with her. This is not a warning. It’s the sound of the ground already giving way.
I do hope you’re right. What I can’t wrap my head around with the Attorney General is this: no matter who you speak to in Malta — lawyers, civil servants, members of the public, even the most loyal Labour supporters — everyone seems to share the same opinion of Victoria Buttigieg. Other politicians might have their critics, but they also have their defenders. With Buttigieg, though, it feels like there’s unanimous dislike, and a widespread belief that she’s the crook at the centre of so many of Malta’s problems. So why on earth is she still in power?
You’re right on the money, every conversation ends the same these days: people don’t trust the AG anymore. Trust isn’t a press release; it’s a feeling the public either has or doesn’t, and right now it’s gone. The decent thing would be to step aside, take a long, honest look in the (what might need to be an inbreakable) mirror, and let someone rebuild the credibility that office used to carry. No drama, no spin. Just a quiet exit and a little humility. Malta deserves better than endless excuses and eye-rolling “nothing to see here” statements. Time to bow out and make space for someone who can restore confidence.