MIDI Plc bondholders, with an outstanding loan of €50 million, have been put into a very fragile position following Prime Minister Robert Abela’s spectacular and populist U-turn to initiate the process to terminate the 99-year concession related to the Manoel Island development.
MIDI, which held its annual general meeting last week, informed some 3,000 bondholders that an unnamed banking institution, which had already agreed to finance part of the outstanding bonds due to mature next year, and Anton Camilleri, known as Tal-Franċiż, who was going to be the strategic partner in the project, have pulled out as a consequence of the government’s declarations that the project is dead.
This rapid development has left MIDI without a banking agreement and a project partner, leaving its bondholders exposed to a possible default next year. In a company announcement, MIDI referred to ‘the difficulties it has suddenly encountered’.
Declaring that it has lost its bond financing from the bank, “for which a term sheet had already been secured” and “the strategic investor”, it said that its plan and agreements “can no longer be pursued”.
“In light of the new circumstances, this strategy is under review and will be influenced by the outcome of ongoing discussions with the government.”
“It is the company’s intention that compensation received from the termination of the Manoel Island concession will be first applied to meet the company’s repayment obligations under the bond,” the company added.
Financial experts familiar with the matter who spoke to The Shift described the government’s rushed and populist decision as “dangerous” and “ill-thought”.
While arguing that it was nice that the island would be turned into a park, they warned that this would have financial consequences.
“It is obvious that the Prime Minister changed his position on the development only because of a 30,000-petition and not on principle.”
Just a week before attacking MIDI, Abela ruled out ending the concession.
“Even if it were true that the concession’s terms were broken, something which the company contests, was this the only one in Malta?” one source said, citing similar concessions to the Mediterranean Maritime Hub, Smart City, industrial factories and others as a few of many examples.
Experts said that while playing the populist, Abela didn’t realise that it would be his government (taxpayers) who would ultimately fork out the bond repayment; he is now negotiating with MIDI.

The Shift is informed that negotiations on compensation, which include what MIDI has spent so far on Manoel Island and its restoration, are still in their infancy. No formal submissions have been made yet.
Asked for the price tag they are expecting, a spokesman for MIDI told The Shift that no figures have been presented yet as the process was still ongoing.
Negotiations are not expected to take very long, as the government is well aware that a default on a €50 million bond will wreak havoc in the market and create serious political repercussions for Prime Minister Robert Abela.
Many were surprised by MIDI’s swift reaction to give in without a fight. Sources consulted by The Shift indicated that MIDI’s principal shareholders – many of whom are seasoned businessmen – realised that the real estate market had undergone significant changes. The project, which would have required an investment of around €500 million, was no longer necessarily worthwhile in terms of profit.
A spokesperson for MIDI told The Shift the project could not be realised without the government’s support.
Sign up to our newsletter Stay in the know
"*" indicates required fields
Tags
#Alec Mizzi
#bonds
#Manoel Island
#Midi plc
#populism
#project
#Robert Abela
#taxpayers
It makes the Maltese government as reliable as Europe and the Russian asset grab. fdi will disappear in time for profane sainthood.
Nghid jien, jekk ghandhom ihallsu €50 miljun bonds is Sena d-diehla, la gabruhom nefquhom x’imkien. Nispera LI Robert flimkien ma siehbu Clyde jicekjaw fejn intefqu qabel ma jintriga bil famfarunati tieghu Robert
ANY INVESTMent has an element of risk. if the investment goes south then that is simply the way things go with investments. will the government now step in for every bad investment anyone makes, using taxpayer funds. corrupt to the core and protecting big business at the expense of honest tax paying citizens. corrupt to the core.
This is a really ridiculous argument. Since the GoM let others abuse and steal public property such as Smart City and Chambray, it is not fair that GoM does not allow MIDI to do the same with Manoel Island. So is GoM to be castigated for responding to public pressure to do the right thing!!!
GoM did not act in a populist way but observed its rights and duties under the contract between the parties. MIDI signed the contract willingly and no one forced them. I don’t suppose that had the boot been on the other shoe and MIDI had the right to take back a property, they would not have exercised that right because someone was going to suffer!!
The financial intermediaries quoted in the report should have advised their clients not to buy the bond by a crap company. The bond was going to finance old borrowing in the form of an old bond and bank borrowing without a single penny going to Manoel Island. In the prospectus MIDi wrote that it had no money for the Manoel island project and was looking for investors. MIDI did not tell the bond investors how it was going to redeem the bond at maturity in 2026. MIDI even told investors that GoM had the right to take back the property by 31 March 2026 if it did not meet certain criteria.
The Bond is secured with MIDI property held under a trustee. Now the company should do the right thing and liquidate the security to pay off the bond holders.
This article sounds like a paid article. Midi has been benefitting from this lease for years and has not fulfilled its obligations. Midi has turned togne point into an architectural disaster with buildings far larger than they were supposed to be. Now they want to make us believe they are on the brink? With the shift aiding and abetting? We need more of these u turns not less and if for once the maltese population gains at the detrimemt of a corporate giant so what god knows how many time it has been screwed by the same.
The Shift is NOT aiding and abetting anyone and has NOT been paid a cent for the article. How you just fire these accusations without thought or proof just never fails to amaze.
Oh no, not the bondholders 🙁
The bondholders should be questioning the directors as to why the company is set to lose thia concession due to its defaults