Company that bought BOV loans starts biting

25 court cases launched

 

The private company that bought some 700 Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) last year from the Bank of Valletta has already launched some 25 different court cases against former BOV clients and companies that did not pay up their outstanding loans after several warnings.

In a clear warning to the estimated 700 creditors, who still must pay their dues, 35 14 Capital SCC Plc has already taken 25 of the NPL clients to court, asking for repayments or executive orders by the court to sequestrate their property and sell it through a court auction to recoup these debts.

An analysis of the ongoing court cases by The Shift shows that so far, the value of the ongoing court cases amounts to more than €5 million, apart from an interest rate of 8% on the outstanding debts.

Some of the cases initiated by 35 14 Capital.

In some cases, the court has already ordered the execution of the sale of property, which the debtors had used as collateral to acquire their original loans from BOV.

Financial services practitioners following the court cases told The Shift that 35 14 Capital is adopting an aggressive stance in dealing with the former BOV debtors, sending a message that it is serious about recouping the outstanding loans.

“There is nothing wrong in this as what BOV has done is all legitimate in banking practices. Although the value at which BOV has decided to sell its NPLs might be controversial and debatable, the company taking over is interested in recuperating its investment in the shortest possible time,” a senior financial services expert told The Shift.

BOV’s decision to sell some 700 non-performing loans to 35 14 Capital was made in late 2023 and revealed by The Shift a few weeks later.

While BOV never divulged details on how and which loans were sold and their original cumulative value, The Shift had revealed that these were sold for €26 million even though their estimated value may be over €100 million.

The bank had defended its decision to sell the NPL’s portfolio, claiming that the difficulty in recovering the loans made it advantageous to sell them off for a lump sum. The deal has improved the bank’s balance sheet.

As soon as the businessmen behind the company buying the loans were revealed, eyebrows were raised in the financial services industry.

35 14 Capital is a partnership directed by Jean Carl Farrugia, founding partner of DF Advocates and Christopher Vella, CEO at business consultancy Polymath & Boffin.

The owners of DF Advocates Kevin Deguara and Jean Carl Farrugia.

Farrugia and his partner at DF Advocates, Kevin Deguara, are currently facing criminal charges in connection with the scandalous hospital deal.

Suspicions increased when it was revealed that Deo Scerri, a former BOV Chairman and Labour Party auditor, acted as one of its advisers.

Scerri has always denied any conflict or influence in the company’s decision to acquire the loans. He terminated all his connections with 35 14 Capital earlier this year, citing retirement as the main reason.

                           

Sign up to our newsletter

Stay in the know

Get special updates directly in your inbox
Don't worry we do not spam
                           
                               
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
El Flagell
El Flagell
1 month ago

I wonder where did they get the capital to buy these loans? Probably another BOV loan. Il veru kas tal hbieb tal hbieb

Mark
Mark
1 month ago

This work in recovering loans from clients should have been done by BOV who has the muscle, resources, lawyers and money to do so.

Can someone from BOV explain why they did not take this aggressive but correct approach? How much money has the bank lost and how much value have the shareholders lost?

Steve
Steve
1 month ago
Reply to  Mark

Your greed is unbelievable. This is a bank which makes over €200 million in profit !

Lawrence Mifsud
Lawrence Mifsud
1 month ago
Reply to  Mark

Please let us know when you see an answer. Thanks.

Joseph
Joseph
1 month ago

Did the company pay the 20 million due to BOV ? OR is this another scam of get rich with no investment ..
Shall the bank have to wait until they collect it? If this is the case what deal was it?

Steve
Steve
1 month ago
Reply to  Joseph

If it improved their accounts I would imagine it was paid

Mario Fenech
Mario Fenech
1 month ago

Mhux ovvja.

Andrew grima
Andrew grima
1 month ago

So a crooked legal firm is extorting money from defaulting loans when bov has the necessary resources to pursue this. This is organized crime at its best . And where did the money to buy up these loans come from?

James Briffa
James Briffa
1 month ago

This is not a conspiracy anymore.. you ll own nothing amd be happy about it

Mirk.p
Mirk.p
1 month ago

but what law is this?? Bov can change another debt collection company, that’s ok, but of course if I have a debt, it always remains with BOV, I can’t wake up one day and discover that I have a debt with another company that I don’t even know… but on this island are there the basics of the law?

and there is no aggressive or gentle way of collections.. but the terms of collection in case of non-payment, must be the same as those of BOV, precisely because the debt was initially with the bank

Related Stories

Opinion: Labour’s great strides
Robert Abela made another of his comical claims –
Record: PM’s ‘sidekick’ gets eleventh job
A 31-year-old lawyer with just a few years of

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo