Public urged to raise objections to ‘monstrous Comino village’ development

ENGOs say the development could become a ‘Comino village’ of permanent residences through the use of legal loopholes

 

Environmental organisations are calling on the public to oppose plans by the Hili Group for a complex of villas on Comino as part of their plans for the new Comino hotel.

The plans, which are at present being considered by the Planning Authority, would see the site of the former Comino Hotel redeveloped. This will include the replacement of the nine derelict bungalows at Santa Marija Bay with a larger complex of 19 villas, complete with a convenience store and amenities.

The ENGOs say the development could become a “Comino village” of permanent residences through legal loopholes.

The Environment and Resources Authority approval of the project is currently being appealed before the Planning Tribunal (EPRT) by seven organisations: BirdLife Malta, Din l-Art Ħelwa, Flimkien għal Ambjent Aħjar, Friends of the Earth Malta, Moviment Graffitti, Nature Trust Malta – FEE, and Ramblers’ Association of Malta.

They said it is “shocking that such a development is even being considered. The public should take the opportunity to express their frustration at this proposed development and remind the Planning Authority that their duty does not lie with developers and big business but towards the greater good ‘on behalf of the community to provide a balanced and sustainable environment’, as per its mission statement.

Comino is designated as a Rural Conservation Area, a Nature Reserve, a Special Area of Conservation, a Special Protection Area, an Important Bird Area of International and EU Importance, a Natura 2000 site, a Bird Sanctuary, and a Dark Sky Heritage site.

The proposed development is not compatible with any of these designations and has been described as “monstrous” and an “occupation by stealth” of the island which, the ENGOs insist, “should be held in trust for all Maltese and Gozitan residents to enjoy”.

“The influx of heavy equipment, construction materials and workforce would cause massive environmental impact, as well as the irreversible destruction of areas of natural habitat for the complex itself and the greater area of disturbance around it,” they point out.

They have also raised “grave concerns” about increased traffic introduced to the area and the handling and treatment of supplies and waste leading to an increase in vermin and litter, which are directly harmful to the delicate local ecosystem, including populations of protected vulnerable Yelkouan Shearwaters in the direct vicinity.

“We cannot understand how ERA went ahead and recommended this project when it breaches every environmental and planning policy in the book, ranging from the EU’s Habitats Directive to the Local Plan,” the same organisations recently said.

“Instead of safeguarding biodiversity and the delicate ecological balance of this Natura 2000 site, ERA has approved the extensive urbanisation  of the island, the uprooting of 380 protected trees and the denaturation of the site.”

Objections to application PA/4777/20 can be submitted to the Planning Authority by 23 January online at: https://pa.movimentgraffitti.org/permit/24

                           

Sign up to our newsletter

Stay in the know

Get special updates directly in your inbox
Don't worry we do not spam
                           
                               
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mark Debono
Mark Debono
1 year ago

Then will come a super market then a petrol station then the inevitable flats then a pastitzzi shop/kebab shop

Thomas
Thomas
1 year ago

Another sad example for the meaning of ‘continuity’ by the PL and the present PM. Nothing will be spared and that is the result of the landslide victory of the PL in the March 2022 GE. They feel even more encouraged to proceed the way they always did since 2013 and the fact that one can, by experience and conduct of the PL, expect the government to don’t give a damn what ‘the other half’ of the electorate thinks and want, proves the point that the PL only cares for her voters.

I wish those NGOs opposing this further damaging good luck and to get as many supporters as possible, even when it will be ignored by the government, but the least they can do is to make a point, once again.

Maybe this matter will have some reaction from the EU as the Maltese government is about to allow the distruction of a protected Natura 2000 area and I wonder whether there might be some action taken on a EU level.

There are still four years to go in which the PL can continue with allowing developers to pastening every space on the Maltese islands until nothing is left and probably then, there might be a stop to this building craze. I wonder, who would go to live in these planned 19 villas.

With every year that passes by and this PL govt still in place, Malta becomes even more unattractive to spend a week of holiday there. One better looks for other places, sad but true.

KLAUS
KLAUS
1 year ago

How much sense does it make to keep up the PA under the eyes of the ROBBER Abela?

It seems to be only about burning money and brown envelopes.
DESTROYING THE FUTURE OF OUR KIDS!

Probably it is even better for Malta to dissolve the authority, since from there nothing FOR Malta but exclusively FOR big business and AGAINST Malta.

Tony Montanaro
Tony Montanaro
1 year ago
viv
viv
1 year ago

Like watching the evolution of blitzkrieg in real time.

Mick
Mick
1 year ago

Knowing how this place works, I imagine there are apparatchiks with their new address and plot number already in hand.

Related Stories

‘Every day in my work, I see Daphne’s legacy’
In a speech marking the 6.5-year anniversary of the
Gaffarena loses ‘breach of human rights’ case on illegal development
Mark Gaffarena – the person at the centre of

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo