A parliamentary process to reassess the fee paid for a 2017 change-of-use permit on land owned by Fortina has yet to begin, as the Lands Authority continues to seek guidance on how to proceed, its chief executive told MPs on Monday.
Robert Vella, CEO of the Lands Authority, said he has not yet drawn up the terms of reference for a new valuation, despite having been instructed to do so two months ago by parliament’s National Audit Office Accounts Committee. Vella said he expects to finalise the brief by the end of January.
The reassessment follows a National Audit Office (NAO) finding that the original valuation – €8.1mn, based on advice from three architects commissioned by the Lands Authority in 2017 – was flawed. However, Vella dismissed a separate report by audit firm Grant Thornton, which had put the value of the transaction at €21million, calling the assessment “full of holes”.
Appearing before the committee, Vella – a government appointee who has faced criticism over previous land-related decisions – said an internal verification team he chaired had reviewed the Grant Thornton study and found its assumptions “neither legal nor technically sound”. He argued that if contemporary methods were applied, the transaction would have been valued at €8.2 million, not €21 million.
“The Grant Thornton report is not correct, would not have been acceptable to us, and we would have rejected it,” Vella said, adding that he believed the valuation was “illegal” because Maltese law requires such assessments to be carried out by three architects appointed by the Lands Authority.

Opposition MPs questioned the scope and credibility of Vella’s review, arguing his work did not match the mandate given to him by the committee.
Vella insisted that he needs more time to draw up the new terms of reference for the three original architects – Dennis Camilleri, Claude Mallia and Mario Cassar – who conducted the original 2017 valuation. He said they had agreed to revisit their assessment once new terms of reference were finalised.
The Grant Thornton report, one of six valuations conducted under disgraced former prime minister Joseph Muscat’s administration, only surfaced during an NAO inquiry, which criticised officials for withholding the document from parliament and the public. The six valuations ranged widely from €2.3 million to €23 million.
Fortina ultimately paid €8.1 million for the change-of-use concession, but did so under protest, arguing the Lands Authority had overcharged compared with other valuations it had issued on similar properties.
Opposition figures and independent candidate Arnold Cassola, who requested the NAO investigation, have alleged political interference and favourable treatment for the company’s owners.
Sign up to our newsletter Stay in the know
"*" indicates required fields
Tags
#Fortina
#Grant Thornton
#Ian Borg
#Lands Authority
#parliament
Is it arrogance on the part of the Lands Authority CEO when he chooses to depart from instructions received from Parliament and is already pre-judging the issue of the valuations in possession of Lands, rather than restricting himself to the administrative task of establishing the terms of reference for an ad hoc committee of architects set for the purpose ?
Or is he acting on the instructions of Government ministers in an obvious interference exercise in order to ensure that at the end of the day the Original Lands valuation is reconfirmed?
The latter reason is the most likely. Like all others in similar positions, he does as he is told.
The approach displayed BY THE ceo OF THE LANDS aUTHORITY is characteristic of a Labour government mindset, which has fostered the belief that anyone can assume any role, regardless of expertise. Unsurprisingly, this has led to a decline in standards. One must ask: aside from being Abela’s ally, what qualifications does the CEO of the Lands Authority possess to make authoritative statements on property valuations? It appears he may be unaware that both European and International Valuation Standards exist, requiring professionals to dedicate years of study and continuous development to remain current in this ever-evolving field. Yet, the CEO of the Lands Authority projects an air of unwarranted certainty, embodying the typical arrogance associated with this attitude.
….he believed the valuation was “illegal” because Maltese law requires such assessments to be carried out by three architects appointed by the Lands Authority.
Very interesting to hear this when the valuation of the ITS was mainly based on the ““independent and professional” valuation by Deloitte” as had JM stated at the time.
its interesting to see that whilst most of the times they contradict themselves over the years, their legacy of lies continues.