Tista’ taqra dan l-artiklu bil-Malti
The Shift on Wednesday won another eight cases filed by the government against the newsroom’s managing editor to deny freedom of information requests.
Today’s eight appeal court victories bring the cases Mr Justice Lawrence Mintoff has ruled in The Shift’s favour to 10.
The government has mounted 40 challenges against the newsroom, draining its resources in litigation on cases in which the Information and Data Protection Commissioner Ian Deguara and the Chair of the Appeals Tribunal Anna Mallia have already ruled in The Shift’s favour.
The legal saga has been ongoing for over two years. It has seen the government go to every length to withhold information on its public relations expenditure to buy positive media coverage from the entities owned by Saviour Balzan.
In today’s rulings, Judge Mintoff ordered another eight government entities to cough up information on payments made to MediaToday and Saviour Balzan’s associated companies since 2013.
These were: WasteServ Malta, the National Statistics Office, the Housing Authority, the Gozo Ministry, the Ministry for Energy, Enterprise and Sustainable Development, the Tourism and Consumer Protection Ministry, the Social Accommodation Ministry and the Armed Forces of Malta.
Today’s decisions follow similar rulings against the Malta Film Commission and Circular Economy Malta.
Not only will the entities have to provide the requested information, but they have also been slapped with all the legal expenses covering both the Information and Data Protection Tribunal as well as those incurred by the appeal cases in court.
All these expenses will be incurred by taxpayers, thanks to the government’s decision to avoid transparency in its dealings with Balzan at all costs.
It is extremely rare that the government objects – twice – to decisions taken by its own appointed bodies.
International media freedom organisations have said the cases constitute SLAPP – vexatious lawsuits intended to cripple a newsroom financially.
They have called on the government to drop the cases, as has MEP David Casa, who led a resolution in the European Parliament that backed the call for the cases to be dropped.
“The writing is on the wall. The government is losing one case after another, yet it still wastes taxpayer money on court fees, lawyer fees and penalties. The government must be transparent, whether it involves Saviour Balzan or any other crony,” said The Shift’s Managing Editor, Caroline Muscat.
Crucially, the rulings now provide case law that limits the government’s abuse of the FOI Act.
“Balzan has typically resorted to attacks against those asking the questions, attempting to throw mud, hoping that some of it will stick. The Shift has chosen a difficult path to finance its independence, never taking public money from the government or political parties. And it is the only newsroom to publish a statement of its income and expenditure to its readers,” Muscat added.
“This is about press freedom. Balzan has said ‘he has no choice but to ask for the same’ from other media houses. We welcome the exercise,” Muscat concluded.
Sign up to our newsletter Stay in the know
"*" indicates required fields
Tags
#Anna Mallia
#Appeals Tribunal
#Freedom of Information requests
#Ian Deguara
#Information and Data Protection Commissioner
#MaltaToday
#MediaToday
#Pelagicus Media
#Saviour Balzan
#SLAPP
#State funding