There is a good probability that the massive government tender for a €400 million incinerator has been compromised and will have to be cancelled or reissued after financial data on bidders’ offers were published prematurely while a competitive dialogue was still ongoing.
The waste-to-energy tender is one of the largest public procurement processes the country has ever seen and it is now on its second attempt after the first was cancelled shortly after its launch.
Sources close to the process have expressed disbelief over how the process has been botched yet again and have raised suspicions about behind-the-scenes manoeuvres to favour one particular bidder.
Issued last year under the so-called ‘Competitive Procedure with Negotiation’, the Department of Contracts has called for bids for the design, build and operation of a waste-to-energy facility.
There are no local suppliers or expertise in the field, which is new to Malta, and interest in the project has mainly been registered from large multinationals.
The concept, which has been in the pipeline for at least a decade, is to build a €200 million incinerator in Maghtab that will convert domestic waste into energy. Another €200 million will be given to the winning bidder for the incinerator’s operation for the following 20 years.
According to public procurement procedures, the government is allowed to begin competitive dialogues with shortlisted bidders to ensure the best technological solutions are being offered, before a final financial bid is requested.
But even though such talks with the five shortlisted consortia are still ongoing, the Department of Contracts has, contrary to standard procedure, published the indicative prices of four of the five bidders shortlisted.
The publication divulged sensitive information to rival competitors before they are to be requested to make their final offers.
The financials that were published prematurely can be downloaded here.
The move immediately raised eyebrows among the tender’s observers, who described it as a ‘mistake’ that is “compromising the whole process.”
Former MP Jason Azzopardi has, in fact, publicly called out the incident as a “planned mistake aimed to give an advantage to a particular company close to the Prime Minister”.
The government, meanwhile, is not answering questions about what happened or whether the publication of the financials had been done in error or not
The Shift also asked the Department of Contracts to explain why such financial data has been published when the competitive dialogue is still ongoing and before the best and final offer details – known as the BAFO –are still to be sent to the competitors.
The contracts department has not yet replied to those questions. Nor is it explaining whether the tender will now have to be cancelled and if anyone will be held responsible for the blunder.
The five consortia shortlisted
According to the erroneously-published data, a Spanish-German consortium named Maghtab Gdida Energija Nadifa indicated the lowest price at €395 million, just under the tender’s €400 million indicative value.
The consortium is made up of Urbaser S.A.U, a Spanish recycling multinational, Gruppo Cobra, another Spanish multinational and German equipment supplier Standardkessel Baumgarte GmbH S.A.
Another Spanish consortium, Sacyr Industrial Operation, indicated a price of €422 million. That was followed by French Paprec Energies together with local construction magnates Bonnici Group at €617 million and Japanese Hitachi Zosen Inova AG at €983 million.
Another consortium, FCC Medioambiente International S.L.U., is also still in the running but has not yet lodged an indicative offer. That consortium comprises FCC Medioambiente (Spanish), Termomeccanica SPA, Italian and Acciona Industrial SA, based in Madrid.
Malta’s Bonnici Group is the only Maltese shareholder among the bidders.
Although the publication error gave an indication of what the bidders are offering, it will be the price they submit at the end of the competitive dialogue, which is expected by July, that will matter.
Since the bidders now know, thanks to the government’s mistake, what their fellow bidders have indicated, they are now expected to adjust their strategies and final financial offers, meaning the process has been compromised. Bidders may now ask for the process to start afresh.
Any cancellation or legal challenge to the tendering process will continue to delay Malta’s already late goal to reach the EU’s binding waste management targets.
The tenders fall under the political responsibility of Environment Minister Miriam Dalli and her political appointee, WasteServ CEO Richard Bilocca.
There is a person in charge of the procurement process. Who is that person? That is the story. Not that companies are vying for business, or that politicians are corrupt, we know that. The regulatory agency funded to control the process is responsible. Find the person in charge and fire him/her. That is how it is supposed to work.
Fire him? Jail him, is the only option. But then the AG will invent all the satanic verses to set the person free.
AT least shame and tell, it will catch up with them and their legacy
If only an effort would be made to find the person responsible.
The police and AG can’t even bring successful prosecutions when the culprit has been identified, so you can read into that what you will.
Nixtieq inkun naf b’haga wahda li hi wahda li jaghmlu sew. Kollox medjokri u mahmug.
This is another FRAUD. Same as Electrogas , same pattern in the selection process, only this time the offers were ” Fraudulently ” made public. Now friends of friends can have a coffee at the 4th floor.
And the winner is bonnici bruvers
Is anything decent expected from crooks?
Where is EU oversight in all of this and more?
I was all in favour of us joining, but it’s as bad as this lot…!
We blame the EU for our mistakes when we do not look inwardly , The PL governs Malta and not the EU The people who saw all the wrong signs and a killing, though still voted for the corrupt, to continue making a mess of our country are the only ones to blame. PL call their own people names and they have such a baggage of scandals and yet their supporters clap. It is the people who have to change Malta’ s future and no one else.
Malta is going to need a partner that has a heavy political influence in order to secure EU funding. Much more important than the price. The technological level, undisclosed, is also very important, as any incinerator is a source of cancers and health and environmental hazards.
400 million spend to get a new source of pollution… The country is to small for a project of that size.
It is a shame for the all related authorities to leak the prices. I don
t understand why the consortia which didn
t provided price is still in the competition? Did they knew that the process will leak so they haven`t placed it??? Big questions!!!There is a court case still open of euro25,000 bribe that had been asked for in a tender of some 100, 000 in the same recycling sector..imagine on 400million what is expected.
It seems that the tenderers had to submit a price. Did anyone check if (as is usually the norm) the tender stipulated that a ‘1’ is inputted in ePPS, as submitted by most tenderers? It’s not Government’s fault if some bidders disclosed their financials. ePPS is automatically unlocked without any control on the part of Government on the contents that will be made available.
Iva kollox bil-h___ f`dal-pajjiz !
This is a case to be investigated by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office as it involves suspicion of fraud involving EU funds. Malta’s EPPO Dr Farrugia should take note. Someone has to answer.