European Commission slaps Malta with five infringement proceedings

Malta’s complete ban on the advertising of legal services is being called into question

 

Five new cases of infringement of EU law have been opened against Malta in the European Commission’s February 2023 infringement package.

The five cases cover a variety of issues including deficiencies in the protection of the marine environment, a failure to finalise water management plans, the derogation for the spring hunting of turtle doves, the total ban on legal services advertising and a failure to correctly implement laws fighting child sex abuse.

Malta’s current total ban on advertising for lawyers and advocates has been a matter of debate for some time.

The Commission’s formal notice argues that Malta’s total ban infringes on the EU’s services directive, potentially prohibiting lawyers and advocates from fully and competitively participating in the EU’s single market economy.

Malta’s ban, currently reflected in rule two of chapter one, part two of the code of ethics for advocates has been a matter of debate for some time. The rule states that “Advocates shall not in any manner publicise their practices or permit other persons to do so on their behalf or in their interest.”

The European Commission describes the rule as being contrary to the Services Directive’s Article 24(1), which states that “Member States shall remove all total prohibitions on commercial communications by the regulated professions”.

In 2019, The Malta Chamber of Advocates released a consultative paper discussing the validity of the regulation. The paper described it as having been initially intended to maintain a sense of dignity and decorum for the profession, but it lamented its restrictiveness in the modern market.

The paper comments that in countries where similar regulation is more liberalised, the focus falls instead on truthful advertising rather than on a total prohibition.

The rest of the cases cover both newly opened infringements as well as increased action on existing ones.

In relation to the marine environment, a letter of formal notice was sent on Malta’s late reporting on programmes and monitoring measures for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.

Malta was also reprimanded on its late review, adoption and reporting of plans relating to river basin management and flood risk management in another formal notice.

Malta was sent its second letter of formal notice in relation to the incorrect implementation of an EU directive aimed at combatting child sexual abuse in Maltese legislation. The first letter related to the case was sent in July 2019.

Finally, Malta received a second letter of formal notice for its derogation from the EU Birds Directive allowing for the spring hunting of vulnerable turtle doves. This practice was reintroduced by Robert Abela’s government just a week and a half before the 2022 general election.

Within the European Commission’s infringement proceedings, letters of formal notice calling attention to the issue are the first step in a three step process. These are then followed by a reasoned opinion, which is a formal notice to comply with EU law. If this is not adhered to, member states are taken to the European Court of Justice.

                           

Sign up to our newsletter

Stay in the know

Get special updates directly in your inbox
Don't worry we do not spam
                           
                               
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
wenzu
wenzu
1 year ago

Of course, the politicians responsible for this mess, will not be paying any fines themselves, so basically, they don’t give a s–t!

carlos
carlos
1 year ago

Why is it that the EU, who the Maltese majority voted to become members are disillusioned. Stop the subsidies as these are only encouraging corruption.

Charles
Charles
1 year ago

So….when Malta is found guilty and obviously Malta will have to pay for these infringements…what is meant by Malta?! Does it mean that the Malta Taxpayers will have to pay the penalties or do the bureaucratic idiots who failed to do their job properly pay?!? I’ll hazard one guess!!

Annie
Annie
1 year ago

Only 5, I expect there are 100’s more in the pipeline.

Mark
Mark
1 year ago

others will arrive, they have not touched the buildings, without any security base at work and they are the first to dump debris into the sea, just go and see the big hotel under construction in qawra

Austin sammut
Austin sammut
1 year ago

It is plain unethical for a lawyer to advertise his services irrespective of any law, regulation or directive. It is the Chamber of Advocates which should come down on its members in the first place. We have lawyers advertising their services on face book and giving advice on the media.

Related Stories

Saudis behind Bonnici Brothers’ €37 million power station tender
The government has confirmed that the Maltese company awarded
ERA approved the axing of 3,400 protected trees in seven years
The Environment and Resources Authority (ERA) has approved the

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo