Taxpayers to foot €66,500 bill for unfair dismissal of government agency CEO

Taxpayers will be forced to pay Stephen McCarthy, who was the politically-appointed chief executive officer of the Malta Digital Innovation Authority (MDIA) until 2021, €66,500 in compensation after he was found to have been unfairly dismissed.

According to the Industrial Tribunal, the board of the government agency responsible for promoting innovative technologies, chaired by Joshua Ellul at the time, did not follow the law to the letter when it sought to replace McCarthy.

Taking his case to court, McCarthy accused the agency and Ellul of failing to abide by the law by not agreeing to transform his three-year definite contract into an indefinite one.

He said that once he was not given a new contract within the 12-day time window envisaged by the law, his contract automatically became indefinite and the MDIA could not dismiss him.

On his part, the former MDIA chair argued that since he was leaving the organisation and a new board was still to be appointed by the government, McCarthy had been offered a three-month extension when his definite three-year contract drew to an end.

McCarthy, however, turned the offer down and the MDIA board, which includes Labour Party President Ramona Attard as secretary and Labour spokesman turned government consultant Nigel Vella as a member, decided to dismiss McCarthy.

The Industrial Tribunal, headed by former General Workers’ Union official Harold Walls, concluded that Ellul and the board were in breach of the law when they dismissed McCarthy.

Stephen McCarthy.

According to the Tribunal, McCarthy should have been dismissed as soon as he did not accept the new contract and the board should not have waited until the 12-day window elapsed.

This negligence on the part of the MDIA’s board led to the Tribunal accepting that McCarthy had been dismissed irregularly and ordered the payment of €66,500 in compensation.

The MDIA falls under the remit of Economy Minister Silvio Schembri.

McCarthy, who was given various positions under Labour, including that of Housing Authority CEO, spent years leading the Union Print – the General Workers’ Union’s now-defunct printing business. He was replaced at the MDIA by Kenneth Brincat.

Ellul, an associate professor at the University of Malta, resigned from the MDIA in 2022 and was replaced by Air Malta’s former Chief Technology Officer Wayne Grixti.

                           

Sign up to our newsletter

Stay in the know

Get special updates directly in your inbox
Don't worry we do not spam
                           
                               
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
wenzu
wenzu
7 months ago

Perfectly normal practice. Some incompetent government employee screws up and the taxpayer is punished. Viva MLP.

Mick
Mick
7 months ago
Reply to  wenzu

Unfortunately most of the government employees are incompetent TOTALLY but know how to work the system for easy money

Judy
Judy
7 months ago
Reply to  wenzu

The way PL acts and do things as though they know it all, shows that their intelligence is really artificial .

FRANK VELLA
FRANK VELLA
7 months ago

Nafu z’qed naghmlu jew le?

David
David
7 months ago

Another qassata a la Silvio Schembri – really and truly an incompetent scumbag.

makjavel
makjavel
7 months ago

This is fraud. The person who broke the law pays up not the tax payer. Is nobody responsible of his/her actions?

Emmanuel Cilia Debono
Emmanuel Cilia Debono
7 months ago

The public at large is being made to pay for irregularities and inefficiencies of politicians and political appointees.

Manuel
Manuel
7 months ago

Tasarhom kolla il membri tal gvern bil people of trust u l konsulenti xejn ma jihrog ta sugu.

Gaetano Pace
Gaetano Pace
7 months ago

Ma jgħaddux Mill bieb, jgħaddu mit tieqa il flus biex f’ dawk l eluf jiffrankaw envelop kannella u bolla.

Michael A Caruana
Michael A Caruana
7 months ago

The regulation says that a definite contract has to be given after a period of 4 years in employment and not 3 years, as is written in the article. I am reproducing the specific regulation:

“Excluding exceptions for justified reasons, a fixed term contract can be successively renewed up to a maximum period of four years after which the employee shall be considered to be under a contract of indefinite duration. An employee whose fixed term contract has expired and is retained in employment will also be considered to be under an indefinite contract if the employer does not produce a new contract of service within twelve (12) days following the expiry of the previous contract.”

Related Stories

ITS architect fined for bad workmanship in separate Fgura project
Colin Zammit, the owner of  Mosta-based architectural firm Maniera
PBS using millions of public funds irregularly, two-year FOI battle reveals
A Freedom of Information request has revealed that PBS

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo