Former minister Michael Farrugia is a liar. That was confirmed by Robert Abela’s hand-picked Commissioner for Standards in Public Life Joseph Azzopardi.
The Commissioner reached one conclusion: “The Hon Farrugia failed to state the truth…This represents a breach of articles 4.4 and 10.3 of the Ethics Code”. No matter how carefully the Commissioner attempted to mask that truth, it’s out.
Farrugia lied.
ONE’s news headline defied reality. ‘Commissioner’s report on Michael Farrugia published – the deputy did not lie’. That is shockingly brazen even by ONE’s standards. If there were a proper broadcasting authority, it would act. But this is Labour’s Malta where ONE calls black white and nobody bats an eyelid.
The Commissioner bent over backwards to shield Farrugia. He even admitted, in his report, that he bent the rules. Point 22 reads: “The undersigned makes it clear that in these procedures there is no need for allegations to be proven beyond reasonable doubt. It is enough therefore for reasonable conclusions to be reached based on available evidence…But in this specific case (the undersigned) is keeping to the strict criteria of the law”.
Why did the Commissioner change the rules for Farrugia?
Farrugia was asked a simple question by The Times. “Did you meet Yorgen Fenech?” Farrugia deceitfully replied that he “had no such meeting”. When presented with the visitors’ logbook showing he’d met Yorgen Fenech at Castille on 3 March 2014, Farrugia swiftly changed his version: “No such meeting on Mriehel sight (sic) ever took place”.
Farrugia lied and was caught. He certainly didn’t tell the complete truth, as Article 5.7 of the Code of Ethics demands: “They must provide complete and correct information to parliament, cabinet and the general public”.
Farrugia was covering up his dodgy meeting with Yorgen Fenech for good reason. Immediately after their meeting, Farrugia wrote to the Planning Authority and instructed that Mriehel be included as a zone in the high-rise policy. And Fenech’s Tumas Group, along with the Gasan Group, built The Quad towers.
Farrugia was manifestly dishonest. Yet the Commissioner robustly defended him. He argued in his report that Farrugia’s reply that he “never had such a meeting”, was not untrue. “He didn’t say that he did not have any meetings with Fenech but that he did not have a meeting related to the subject in question. Therefore, strictly speaking, it cannot be said he changed his version. It would have been different had he, for example, stated that he ‘never met Mr Fenech’”. How pathetic is that?
Farrugia failed to divulge the truth. He clearly intended to mislead the country. He wanted his suspicious meeting kept secret. Yet the Commissioner fabricated a lamentable defence on his behalf and changed the rules to exonerate him.
Those weren’t Farrugia’s only lies. He deceitfully denied taking the decision to include Mriehel in the high-rise policy. He lied that the evaluation committee dealing with public consultation had taken it, days before he ordered the Planning Authority to include Mriehel.
The Times requested documentation to prove the committee had taken the decision. But Farrugia came up with the dog-ate-my-homework excuse. “I no longer have access to such documentation”. Farrugia’s letter to then-Planning Authority CEO Johann Buttigieg, however, was available. It read, “Mriehel is to be considered as an appropriate location for tall buildings.”
The Commissioner gave Farrugia plenty of opportunity to squirm out of that one too. But not even Abela’s compliant Commissioner could find a way to exculpate Farrugia. He had no option but to find him guilty of “failing to tell the truth”, yet still tried to fudge the issue.
In point 28 of his report, the Commissioner defended Farrugia: “Six years had passed between the events and his replies (to journalists)”. Poor Michael Farrugia. How could he possibly remember such a trivial meeting with Yorgen Fenech at Castille, after which he unilaterally changed government policy in Fenech’s favour?
Throughout the investigation into his despicable behaviour and his flagrant dishonesty, Farrugia displayed Machiavellian deviousness.
He claimed the inclusion of Mriehel in the policy disadvantaged the investors (Yorgen Fenech). Architect David Pace, the Commissioner for Environment and Planning in the Ombudsman’s Office was consulted about this. He stated categorically, “The argument that Yorgen Fenech was disadvantaged by the FAR revision is not correct.”
Farrugia lost it. He maliciously accused Pace of trying to deceive the Commissioner. “This all shows the deceit of Architect Pace,” Farrugia wrote to the Commissioner. Nobody needs Pace’s confirmation to see that Fenech profited handsomely from Farrugia’s abusive intervention – we’ve got The Quad towers to show it.
Farrugia contradicted himself, claiming it was an inter-ministerial committee that had taken the decision. The Commissioner asked Farrugia who sat on that committee. Farrugia failed to answer.
Farrugia claimed that Buttigieg, who would later tell Yorgen Fenech “We can do business whenever you want” was the only other person present at that meeting. Farrugia nominated Buttigieg as his alibi. This was a rerun of the Justyne Caruana-Frank Fabri stunt but the Commissioner accepted it.
Buttigieg’s testimony was a mess of lies. He claimed he sat on that inter-ministerial committee. “Mriehel was in our mind for inclusion…but we left it out…and then we realised we’d left it out…so we put it back in again”.
So why didn’t the Malta Environment and Planning Authority [now the Planning Authority] tell the minister about its revision, the Commissioner asked Buttigieg. And why did Farrugia write to MEPA to include Mriehel? Buttigieg didn’t reply. He couldn’t.
The Commissioner asked Buttigieg whether he knew about Farrugia’s letter. Buttigieg lied again. “I think it is referring to a letter sent to Vince Cassar.” The letter was addressed to Buttigieg, with “Dear CEO” handwritten by Farrugia himself even though he wasn’t the minister. The Commissioner noted that “Doctor Farrugia was Parliamentary Secretary and could not take that decision”.
But he took it anyway, for obvious reasons.
The Commissioner accepted Buttigieg’s evidently false testimony. He didn’t have to. There was someone else at that fateful meeting – Yorgen Fenech. The Commissioner could have called Fenech in to testify about what was really discussed. Instead, he chose to believe two liars.
Sign up to our newsletter Stay in the know
"*" indicates required fields
One of his finest hours
‘300% no danger’, until the foundations started collapsing
Abela’s record cabinet creates a two-tier government
Politics of the two-fingered salute
Tags
#commissioner for standards in public life
#high-rise policy
#Joseph Azzopardi
#Malta
#Michael Farrugia
#Mriehel
#The Quad
#Yorgen Fenech
Other News
One of his finest hours
‘300% no danger’, until the foundations started collapsing
Abela’s record cabinet creates a two-tier government
Politics of the two-fingered salute
2026 general elections: A post mortem attempt
The Europe we joined and the Malta we became
The winner’s burden and the loser’s advantage
Labour down in all districts as PN gains 13,500 votes – biggest swing in Gozo
Democracy is not a bargaining chip
Don’t mention the war
Labour’s populist spending splurge
The muvument korrot lot are all lcorrupt greedy liars.
We’re a cesspit.
Attempting to cover misdeeds with an almost transparent veil is not the stuff of serious investigators.
The more they talk, the more they lie, and what?s more they get caught.
These lot could give the likes of Lorry Sant, Patrick Holland etc lessons in corruption and dishonesty!
You will always remember telling the truth, as there’s only one version to it. When one starts to lie and makes it a habit, one is surely forgetful of what was said, because of the many permutations that one has to remember to attempt to ‘justify’ the lies.
Brazen lies – shameful dishonesty!
Xi jwassal lil Ministru… li ma jkollu x’jaqsam xejn mal-Ippjanar, li m’ghandux farka idea fuq il-bini gholi, li eventwalment jinqabad jigdeb ghal darba darbtejn… biex jasal jikteb personalment lis-CEO tal-MEPA biex idahhlu zona shiha li qatt ma kienet diskussa qabel fost iz-zoni tal-bini gholi?
L-unika twegiba plawzibbli hi envelopp ohxon ohxon. Ghalija Farrugia mhuwiex biss giddieb.
L-eks Prim Imhallef hu l-aktar persuna mhux stmata fil-pajjiz… lil Robert Abela jahartu.
THERE ARE CROOKS EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK……HOW RIGHT DAPHNE WAS !
The real sad thing is that the MLP happy clappers will vote these frauds back in at the next GE. Says a lot for the intellectual capacity of your average labour voter.
The Commissioner and Farrugia are two of a kind. Two underhanded rascals who treat the law and ethical standards as a silly game to be manipulated indulgently by those in the seat of power.
Now, who was it who reminded us of that stupid thing called Gahan? I wonder why!
“Just what the doctor ordered” for Farrugia after 6 years – the new Commissioner for Standards who is below described as “the least respected person in Malta”. I wonder why when he was the Hon. Chief Justice?
… but nothing happens!
THE WRITING IS ON THE WALL FOR THE PL GOVERNMENT.
IT CAN ONLY OFFER LIES, DECEIT AND HYPOCRISY.
And the pockets get fatter and fatter.
I have some worries about both the contents of this article and the comments. The Standards Commissioner made it quite clear that he was only ”judging” Michael Farrugia’s interview with TOM editor Herman Grech in 2020, as the alleged meeting with Yorgen Fenech and its ”after-effects” had taken place before the existence of a Standards Commissioner. That greatly diminished — in the eyes of the Commissioner, of course — the seriousness of Farrugia’s lies. So much so that the Commissioner said that Farrugia did not lie as Arnold Cassola was arguing but simply had not told the truth in his interview with Grech. And that ”conclusion” was buttressed by the ”swallowing” of Johann Buttigieg’s ”testimony”. The ”concidence” of the Farrugia — Fenech meeting at Castille — remember Farrugia at that time was only a PS I believe, not a Minister — with the sudden inclusion of Mriehel as a high-rise area when — a point that is seldom mentioned — the period of public consultation on potential high-rise areas had closed, had all taken place in the ”dark ages” before the existence of a Standards Commissioner. We cannot expect Commissioner Azzopardi to put too much weight on such happenings!
I am not sure this recent, somewhat convoluted ”verdict” by the Standards Commissioner has given rise to so much trumpeting. The facts of the case were widely known at the time of the publication of the then-MEPA results of its “High Rise Areas” consultation. Mriehel had not been included in the list of possible ”high-rise areas” by the time the period for public consultation had closed. But lo and behold, when the list was published Mriehel was there. The fact of the Castille meeting between Michael Farrugia, then PS for Planning, and Yorgen Fenech was known. The post-factum inclusion of Imriehel was of course public and the interest of Fenech and others in the place well-known. There was no need to put two-and-two together. The interested e-NGOs had no problem about labelling Michael Farrugia lies for what they were, years before he repeated then to ToM editor Herman Grech..