Robert Abela promised an Xtra full explanation – but full of what?

On Monday, during two excruciating minutes of dodging questions from journalists, while running through a slideshow of postures — walking-with-purpose, indignation-at-dishonesty, law-explained-to-idiots, more-serious-things-on-my-mind — Robert Abela made a promise.

People could watch that evening’s edition of TVM’s Xtra and hear his “full explanation” of the 2018 property agreement he had with Christian Borg — today, a 28-year-old who is alleged to have various criminal links.

The agreement was in itself legal and the papers were filed with the authorities: Abela transferred his share of the rights to buy a plot in Zabbar to Borg — at a profit. But was it a bona fide transaction?

Borg was then Abela’s client. It’s unusual for lawyers to enter business transactions with clients. Borg was 25 at time, a bit young to be flush. This kind of property transfer is known to be used as a legal loophole for tax evasion and money laundering.

People are asking questions. For all we know, Abela has the evidence to put them to rest; but the questions flow naturally. Newsbook and The Times of Malta put several to him in two minutes. Saviour Balzan, on Xtra, with an hour at his disposal to get the “full explanation”, asked only one.

Balzan asked (I paraphrase): What do you say about the “missiles” sometimes launched at you by your adversaries, such as the story that broke yesterday?

Balzan’s habitual programme attire is a black suit, white shirt and black necktie. Wicked tongues say he dresses like journalism’s undertaker. My money is on the Reservoir Dogs look. Monday’s edition, however, was all Pulp Fiction.

Balzan opened with a zinger: How come the election will be held when it’s due? There were two follow-up questions — which gives some perspective on the single question, with no follow-up, on the property deal.

Balzan framed the story as an Opposition attack — not a rival newspaper’s revelation. Abela replied with a five-minute monologue, in which he evaded the central questions.

The four-part answer began with slamming the Opposition leader, Bernard Grech, for raising the matter of possible tax evasion when his own past income tax declarations weren’t credible.

True, but irrelevant. The story was broken in the press. Questions about Grech don’t make questions about Abela go away.

Second, Abela said the agreement was public, registered and taxes had been paid on it. No one questions that. The issue is whether the agreement is what it seems: that Abela really intended to buy a plot in Zabbar and then changed his mind, selling the right to buy it to someone else.

Abela could easily settle this. What amount of time separated the date when Abela signed the original promise of sale and the date of him selling it? The longer the time, the more credible that he changed an original intention. If he can show he had made financial arrangements for a bank loan to buy the property, that’s more evidence of his bone fide intention.

Of course, if the transfer came hot on the heels of the original agreement, and Abela hadn’t made any arrangements for a loan, then he’s got some explaining to do.

Third, Abela said the property transfer is perfectly regular. Last year alone, there were 1,700 such transactions. Were all the people involved — some 7,000 — all tax evaders and money launderers?

No one’s said that. What’s been said is that a perfectly legitimate transaction is sometimes exploited as a loophole for nefarious purposes.

Abela could shut down the innuendo about himself immediately. He can tell us how many other such transactions he’s been involved in. He’s denied having entered into more than one with Borg. But asked (by The Times and Newsbook) whether he’s ever engaged in other property transfers, he replied, “Those that would emerge from research”.

To a lot of people, that sounds like, “catch me if you can”.

If you change your mind on buying a property once, that can pass. If you change your mind several times — especially with clients — that smacks of premeditated use of a loophole.

Finally, Abela protested that he couldn’t predict that, three years down the line, Borg would be embroiled in the news as he is today.

Another evasion. The question is about what he could reasonably have known in 2018. Did Abela have no questions, back then, about the origins of the 25-year-old’s wealth?

Abela’s answer is that it was the notary’s responsibility to check that. For the property deal, yes. But Abela knew Borg as a client. Did nothing about Borg ring any bells to an experienced lawyer?

If Abela gives reasonable answers to all the real questions, he’d shut the story down instantly. He’d have the pleasure of leaving Grech and Jason Azzopardi with egg on their face — utterly discrediting their suspicions.

Instead, he promised a full explanation but the only thing it was full of was baked air.

                           
                               
guest
16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lisa
Lisa
2 months ago

Will FIAU’s Kenneth Farrugia and Alfred Zammit investigate Robert Abela?

James
James
2 months ago
Reply to  Lisa

I doubt it.

Greed
Greed
2 months ago
Reply to  Lisa

No

carlos
2 months ago
Reply to  Lisa

I doubt it they’re part of the muvument korrott trolls.

Oliver
Oliver
2 months ago

So if Robert Abela worked so hard including weekends to earn 17,000 euro per month from the Planning authority and he also earned a further 130,000 euro for legal services to the Environment Ministry in 2019, how did he find time to do theae other shady deals? At the time he was also the consultant of disgraced Joseph Mucat

James
James
2 months ago
Reply to  Oliver

Well it must have been at the weekends or in the evenings because as you so aptly point out, he was such a busy man looking after all his clients.

George D
George D
2 months ago

Robert Abela opted to keep disgraced Joseph Cuschieri, the former MFSA CEO, who travelled with Yorgen Fenech, as a government appointed member on some boards. Is he afraid that Cuschieri will reveal sensitive info about him?

James
James
2 months ago
Reply to  George D

Yes of course he is afraid. So many have so much on him which is why his stock answer is to say he will start an investigation into every single example of malpractice where his grubby hands have been identified, knowing full well these will grind on for years with no outcome. The Daphne inquiry being just one classic example.

Patricia
Patricia
2 months ago

Salvu Balzan made millions in direct orders from this corrupt Labour Government. That explains it all. Sleeze with sleeze.

Gianfranco Selvaggi
Gianfranco Selvaggi
2 months ago
Reply to  Patricia

Exactly ,Balzan is another individual who calls himself a journalist but all he is after is protecting his income coming from a ridiculous propaganda tool , one sided all the way pleasing his paying master . How’s that for a traitor of the truth . a fake journalist that is what Balzan is

carlos
2 months ago

gurnalist opportunist u facciol. gurnalist ta hubba gozz

Vecca smoke
Vecca smoke
2 months ago

Can you explain why and how a cessation of rights is a legal loophole for tax evasion and money laundering?

Edgar gatt
2 months ago
Reply to  Vecca smoke

Too complicated to explain to a naive person

Ranier
Ranier
2 months ago
Reply to  Vecca smoke

1. Tax evasion:
Tax paid on profit made on property sale is less than income tax paid on same amount earned as a professional fee. If, instead of billing you X euros in legal fees, I “sell” you my property rights and make X euros “profit”, I pay less tax.

2. Money laundering:

Where did the money used to buy the rights come from? If that’s not rigorously checked, then it’s possible to convert dirty money and unexplained wealth into what looks like legally acquired property.

carlos
2 months ago
Reply to  Ranier

rob jahdem biex issa nigu Black listed. Ma jafx jisthi – ISTHI

adriang
adriang
2 months ago

Is it possible to make a search on public records about more on such transactions by the PM? I very much doubt that sych actions are only performed once.

Last edited 2 months ago by adriang

Related Stories

War and conflict: lessons in democracy
Anġlu Farrugia cut a sorry figure in parliament on
Only allegations, just speculation
Ian Borg misled parliament.  On 8 November,  Borg told

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo Award logo