The duty of candour

On 24 March 2005, Andreas Lubitz deliberately crashed a German wings airliner into the Alps killing himself and 149 passengers.  Police found a medical certificate declaring him unfit to fly.  He turned up for work anyway. The French investigators reported he had taken psychiatric medication the night before the crash.

A 49-year-old French pilot was banned from flying for life and handed a prison sentence after struggling to land his Airbus 320, having taken drugs the night before. Anything that impairs a pilot’s ability to make decisions and execute tasks increases the risk of accidents.

This is why aviation authority regulations are so strict.  They specify minimum time periods between admission to hospital and flying and strictly rule out taking even hay fever medication or tranquillisers. A pilot’s error is costly.

Odis Pitts, a bus driver crashed into multiple cars, then struck a railroad bridge injuring passengers. Police found him unresponsive at the wheel. He overdosed the night before. He was sentenced to 10 years in jail. Drivers’ errors are costly too. That is why US federal regulations require commercial drivers to be tested for drugs before employment and randomly after. Those found with any measurable amount of drugs are put ‘out of service’ and referred for evaluation and treatment.

Dr Batak Shokouhi, a Manchester GP was struck off the register and will never practise after being caught abusing drugs. Doctors’ errors are costly too. That is why the Medical Council obliges all doctors to raise concerns when patients’ safety is compromised by colleagues. Patients’ interest comes first and overrides personal and professional loyalties.

Doctors are clearly instructed that they should not wait for proof to raise concerns. The Medical Council should be informed immediately if there are serious risks to patients. The concern should be made public if patients remain at risk. When this doesn’t happen, patients die.

At Stafford hospital, 1,200 patients died between 2005 and 2009 because medical staff protected the organisation and their colleagues instead of patients. The Francis report concluded that the “shocking care” occurred because “staff who spoke out were deterred from doing so through fear and bullying”. The report highlighted the “duty of candour” – the necessity of transparency to prevent tragedy.

On 23 March, Education Minister Justyne Caruana was admitted to hospital. According to a DOI statement, she was in a “stable condition” and “recovering”. The statement was vague and raised more questions than it answered. Journalists contacted the Ministry of Education with questions.  The Ministry failed to reply.

Reports leaked out that the Minister was being treated for a drug overdose. This was never denied. Some, including former President Coleiro Preca, were outraged. “Shameful lack of ethics and empathy in trying to sensationalise the grief that this woman, mother and political person is going through” she denounced. “We have crossed the line” she added.

Labour Party President Ramona Attard chimed in: “This woman has gone through difficult times, I respect the privacy of the individual… there is a line that should never be crossed”.

The very next day, Minister Caruana returned to work uploading a photo of herself: “Back in office, thanks for the support”. It had been mere hours since she was hospitalised, allegedly for an overdose.

The Minister’s worrying saga raises several concerns.  Should a pilot, bus driver or doctor on medication unwell enough to be admitted to hospital return to work a few hours after an overdose? Why is publication of their names, personal details and medical issues acceptable?  The simple answer is that the interests of the public override the personal right to privacy of such individuals.

The role of Ministers in public office is no less taxing, stressful or demanding than a pilot’s, a bus driver’s or a doctor’s. The public they serve has every right to know that Ministers are fit to serve and competent to make decisions.

Nobody would climb onto a plane whose pilot was discharged from hospital after an overdose hours before.  Who would put his children onto the school bus whose driver had been previously treated for an overdose?  Coleiro Preca’s outrage about the release of information is misguided. So is Ramona Attard’s.

When former prime minister Alfred Sant was suffering from colon cancer and required treatment the public had a right to know.  Sant did the right thing.  He was transparent and informed the nation of his health issues.  Regular updates with explicit details of his surgery were provided. Didn’t Sant have a right to privacy, too? Were the hospital authorities crossing the line, as Coleiro Preca put it, when they showed us the gory images of how his colonic tumour was excised by his surgeon Anthony Zammit? No.

Caruana’s health issues are of keen public interest, especially to teachers and students at this disruptive time. Her precipitous return to work is deeply worrying. Nobody should be ‘back in office’ hours after hospitalisation – particularly a Minister, making crucial decisions.

Her return raises serious concerns about her insight. As Ramona Attard pointed out, “this woman has gone through difficult times in the last few months”. Caruana’s judgement has long been suspect.  Her latest actions leave no doubt.

Her decision to return to work is not smart – it puts the public and her own health at risk. If a driver is back at work, hours after overdosing, he faces jail. The minister, however, is lauded. Struggling with the pressures of office and personal circumstances, she is making the wrong calls.

The prime minister has two pressing duties. The duty to protect the public from decisions taken by a potentially unfit minister. But also the duty of care towards his minister. If revelations about the Minister’s hospital admission are correct, a few hours of ‘observation’ won’t suffice.

As doctors we are taught that delaying help for a colleague in trouble with such issues can be fatal – and for more than just the single colleague. We have a duty of candour. So does the prime minister.

                           
                               
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
D M Briffa
D M Briffa
7 months ago

It has long struck me as odd that politicians, especially those who wield a lot of power, don’t have to pass regular psychological and drug tests in the same way that airline pilots do. If they had to, perhaps America might have avoided having Trump as a president. And there are many other examples across the globe.

Stevie Haston
Stevie Haston
7 months ago

Justin Caruana needs to resign or be sacked, its very simple, her paying off her ‘friend’ or lover on tax payers money is a sign of how corrupt she is, its clear for every one and part and parcel of what is wrong with Maltese government.

viv
viv
7 months ago

An oddly miraculous and speedy recovery. Upped the dose – combined with faith in a rotting creed?

Godfrey Leone Ganado
Godfrey Leone Ganado
7 months ago

Once again, prosit Kevin for another great article.
Quote ‘President Coleiro Preca was outraged’.
Shameful lack of ethics and empathy in trying to sensationalise the grief that this woman, mother, and political person is going through” she denounced. “We have crossed the line she added.
Transpose this to the journalist, a wife, a mother, a daughter who was demonised for years, by the President’s Labour Party and colleagues, including herself implicitly or explicitly, with a party/government commissioned blog to make sure that the build up across the line will give the state, of which she was President, enough reason to heinously assassinate her, for exposing the filth and mammoth corruption of her colleagues, which corruption she endorsed by never doing anything to stop it, and which she neither condemns today, when all that Daphne Caruana Galizia exposed, has been and is being vindicated, while showing how absolutely right she was.
President Coleiro Preca, now ‘Emeritus’:
– where were your ethics and support for a demonised woman and the freedom of the press, when this filth happened? In some corner gagged by your paymasters?
– where was, and is, your empathy towards Daphne’s grieving family?
– did you ever sit in court next to the family, listening horrendously to the unfolding plots planned in the corridors of political power?
– did you ever visit the memorial in Valletta to pay your respects, or is that a line which your paymasters, past and present, don’t allow you to cross?
President, your being outraged is downright fake, even if you may have shed your Party’s symbolic tears, but please note that we are not just outraged, but also terribly disgusted and shaken, that after so many years, you are still imprisoned by your previous and present Godfathers.

Karen Zerafa Boffa
7 months ago

Well said !

A T Mamo
A T Mamo
7 months ago

Just to make a point. Was there any uproar when the news of Melvin Theuma’s suicide was reported and followed by updates? I would say that he also was passing through mental health issues.

saviour mamo
saviour mamo
7 months ago

Iggranfati waħda nobis mal-poter.

Filippa Galea Testaferrata
Filippa Galea Testaferrata
7 months ago

It is always a pleasure you read your articles. Clear, fair, reasoned and to the point.

Related Stories

Legal experts slam ‘reprehensible’ new law on court judgements
Two legal experts condemned as “wholly reprehensible” a new
State Hospitals deal: Taxpayers €300 million – Steward €0
By the end of next year, taxpayers will already
Support investigative journalism that speaks truth to power.