UPDATED: EBA finds FIAU shortcomings on supervision of Pilatus Bank

Updated to include reaction from the FIAU and the Opposition

The European Banking Authority found that the Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit breached EU law in relation to its supervision of Pilatus Bank.

The EBA issued its recommendation, which aims at remedying the particular failings it identified  by encouraging the FIAU to take all the necessary actions to comply with the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Terrorism Financing Directive (AML/CTF).

Following the European Commission’s request of 23 October to investigate a possible breach of Union law (BUL) regarding the apparent failure of the Maltese FIAU and the Maltese Financial Service Authority (MFSA) to effectively supervise Pilatus Bank Ltd in relation to its AML/CFT obligations, the EBA conducted a preliminary enquiry, including an on‐site visit to the Maltese competent authorities.

In particular, the EBA’s preliminary enquiry on the FIAU aimed at understanding the extent to which its approach to AML/CFT supervision and enforcement in relation to Pilatus Bank Limited had been effective and in line with Union law.

On 23 May, the EBA opened an investigation into the FIAU. The EBA concluded that the FIAU failed to conduct an effective supervision of Pilatus Bank due to a number of failures, including procedural deficiencies and lack of supervisory actions by the FIAU after its decision to close the case without imposing any sanctions on the bank.

Despite the several measures taken by the FIAU to remedy the identified failures, the EBA deemed these measures as not sufficient to satisfy the deficiencies that led to the launch of the investigation.

The FIAU has 10 working days to ensure compliance with EU law.

The EBA’s preliminary enquiries in relation to the MFSA are still ongoing.

FIAU reaction:

In a statement, the FIAU said it had “serious reservations” on the process adopted by the EBA in the carrying out its preliminary enquiry and the subsequent breach of EU law investigation. It will be “responding to the authority in due course”.
The agency said it would continue to cooperate with the EBA throughout the implementation of the FIAU’s action plan, which it said had been set in action before the authority’s investigation.
Both the FIAU and the government had undermined the importance of the EBA investigation, with Labour MP Silvio Schembri calling it “routine”.

Opposition reaction:

Opposition finance spokesman Mario de Marco and Kirsty Debono, financial services spokesman, stressed the government had to shoulder responsibility following the EBA’s report on Pilatus Bank and the FIAU and called for immediate action and an investigation into the matter.
Immediate action had to be taken to prevent further harm to Malta’s reputation and its institutions together with resignations.

Read more: Disinformation Watch: How the government buried the EBA investigation

                           

Sign up to our newsletter

Stay in the know

Get special updates directly in your inbox
Don't worry we do not spam
                           
                               
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Stories

Campaign urges total transparency on unnatural death cases
Isabelle Bonnici, the mother of Jean Paul Sofia, who
Portelli insists court decision on illegal penthouses is just ‘an interpretation’ of the law
Developer Joseph Portelli considers the Court of Appeal’s decision

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo