Opinion: The developers’ friend at the Planning Authority

Martin Camilleri is a central figure at the Planning Authority.  He’s a member of the executive council.  He was deputy chairperson of the Planning Board.  He’s the Chairperson of the Planning Commission for ODZ (outside development zones) and UCA (urban conservation areas). So why does he keep making such a fool of himself?

Why does the court keep rebuking him for his “absurd” decisions in favour of developers? How is it even possible that Camilleri keeps getting the most obvious and basic decisions wrong to the developers’ advantage?

What’s more pertinent is why hasn’t Planning Minister Clint Camilleri sacked Martin Camilleri for repeatedly failing to protect the interests of the people?

In his latest gaffe, Martin Camilleri approved an application for the addition of six floors above the four-storey Category A historical Ramel building built in the early part of the 20th century, probably on the design of Giuseppe Cachia Caruana in an Urban Conservation Area in Sliema. 

Ramel Building in Sliema. Photo: Times of Malta / Chris Sant Fournier.

The Court ruled the proposed development at a landmark building in Sliema “should not even have been considered”.

The regulations clearly state, “No additional floors will be allowed over the existing category A properties”.  Which part of “no additional floors” does Camilleri not understand?

Thankfully, the Court revoked Camilleri’s obscene decision.

“The ban on additional floors is not simply a suggestion but an order imposed by the legislator,” the Court declared.  We owe the preservation of that building to Flimkien ghal Ambjent Ahjar (FAA), whose members battled Camilleri’s shameful approval.

Camilleri has a catalogue of such obscene decisions. His name keeps cropping up whenever scandalous applications are approved.  He’s gaining notoriety for taking the side of developers even in the face of rigid regulations preventing those developments.

Why Minister Clint Camilleri refuses to sack him may be explained by Martin Camilleri’s decision about an application lodged by Ronnie Camilleri, the minister’s cousin and driver.

Ronnie Camilleri applied to build a “garage” on ODZ land overlooking the scenic Ramla Bay.

Unsurprisingly, the application drew vociferous objections from residents, NGOs and even the Environment and Resources Authority (ERA), which described his application as a “non-starter”.

Ronnie Camilleri wanted to tile over the area around his 200-metre square ‘garage’ with plenty of windows and doors.  He also wanted to turn a patch of land into a garden and build a “reservoir” that looked remarkably like a swimming pool. And a boundary wall to stop prying eyes.

But despite ERA’s objections and the application breaching several ODZ regulations, Martin Camilleri did not agree with a “refuse recommendation”.  He made that odd decision two days after Minister Clint Camilleri was handed the planning portfolio.

It’s not just the minister’s cousin that Martin Camilleri sought to please.  He also approved the sanctioning of 13 years of illegalities at the Aria Club complex in Iklin after the owner handed the brief to government apologist Robert Musumeci. That application was recommended for refusal by the planning directorate, but Martin Camilleri approved it.  The owners get to keep their illegal structures, and Musumeci pockets his handsome fee.

Architect Robert Musumeci and the Head of Planning Commission Martin Camilleri.

Martin Camilleri was also the chairman who “bent over backwards” to accommodate business tycoon Joseph Portelli.  He bizarrely granted Portelli permission to build a massive swimming pool on protected ODZ land in a green valley in Xagħra.  The case officer twice recommended refusal. But Martin Camilleri leapt to Portelli’s defence, claiming that the proposal “was in the spirit of Gozo’s local plan”.

The same Martin Camilleri approved an application for the development of a villa on ODZ land on the scenic Gelmus hillside in Victoria, Gozo, in June 2023 despite opposition.  The Planning directorate recommended refusal.  But Camilleri deferred the decision five times to give the developer more time to provide new evidence.

Finally, Camilleri approved the application even though no new evidence was provided.  The documents supplied by the developer had been considered insufficient by both the Planning Directorate and the Agricultural Advisory Council. But Camilleri again trampled all over the environmental regulations meant to prevent unnecessary overdevelopment.

Martin Camilleri is also single-handedly responsible for the approval of the monstrous DB project over the former ITS site.  When it came to the final decision, five out of 11 members of the board recused themselves. The remaining six members voted three for and three against.  Martin Camilleri, as chairman, had the casting vote – and he voted in favour of DB.

Camilleri got a damning rebuke from the Chief Justice for his approval of Joseph Portelli’s development in Hal-Wardija, Qala.  Camilleri approved the development of two large swimming pools and gardens over 10,000 square metres of ODZ land. The Court ruled that the Planning Commission headed by Camilleri should never have approved that permit.

It pointed out that local plans were crystal clear – no pools could be built on that ODZ land.  Chief Justice Mark Chetcuti labelled the permit “illegal” and “absurd”.

These are not errors.  If they had been, Martin Camilleri would have been clearly incompetent in his various roles at the Planning Authority and should have been sacked.  But the pattern of outrageous decisions Camilleri took points to something far worse.

The repeated condemnation of his decisions by the courts ought to trigger an investigation. Those developers benefitting from Camilleri’s perverted decisions stand to make millions in profits.  That alone should have alerted investigative authorities to act.

It should certainly have forced Minister Clint Camilleri’s hand.  The fact that it hasn’t raised even more concerns.

Sign up to our newsletter

Stay in the know

Get special updates directly in your inbox
Don't worry we do not spam
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joseph Tabone Adami
Joseph Tabone Adami
1 month ago

“Why does Camilleri keep making such a fool of himself?”

A question quite simple really to answer. The writer provides it himself in the article.

“The pattern of outrageous decisions Camilleri took points to something far worse”

What ‘something far worse’ is pointed to one can easily imagine…….

Fred the Red
Fred the Red
1 month ago

And why does the PN always go AWOL failing repeatedly to condemn such atrocious decisions?

We can expect nothing better from Labour stooges doing the developers’ bidding. Corruption and bad governance are after all, Labour’s hallmark.

But when the Opposition renders itself irrelevant and complicit through its refusal to take a clear and unequivocal stand on individual cases, then things are really beyond redemption.

Steve
Steve
1 month ago

Simple kev, so that they can still look good with developers and get their money. When things go sour it’s the courts which are to blame

saviour mamo
saviour mamo
1 month ago

They do these kind of things because impunity is secured.

Edward Mallia
Edward Mallia
1 month ago

Martin Camilleri is also single-handedly responsible for the approval of the monstrous DB project over the former ITS site. 

  1. In this case Martin Camilleri had plenty of help, some of it possibly unwitting, from other people. First in the list was the Pembroke Council (PL), notified early on about the ”recusal scam” the PA was about to play in this matter, so as not to lose its vote, changed its representative for the 2nd Db ITS proposal vote. That Pembroke in fact voted against is neither here nor there. Camilleri knew that if others fell for his ”scam”, he would still have the casting vote for. The other ”Camilleri” helpers in the scam were those people who accepted the PA thesis — sprung on the board members some 5 minutes before the start of the session — that then-Mr. Justice Chetcuti, who had wiped out the vote on the first DB proposal on the grounds of a blinding conflict of interest of one of the Board members — had ruled that in the event of another discussion on the same proposal, people who had legitimately voted in the first session could not vote again. Now ignoring the legal accuracy of that assertion, to bring the matter up 5 minutes before the start of a PA session is already nefarious conduct, and as such reason to block the session. That apart, the concluding remarks of the Appeals Court on the vote on the first Db proposal could not really be taken to order a ban on the same people voting again on the same proposal. But astonishingly and inexplicably the best legal brains on the non-PA side swallowed the bait and abstained. They did not even have the gumption to point out that despite the fact that the PA had given the same PA number to second Db as the one for first Db, there were quite significant differences. These were in fact mentioned by the Db architects themselves, to emphasise the effort Db was making to meet Pembroke resident objections!
P montebello
P montebello
26 days ago

I refer to your very first paragraph and ask you if you could please play the ABBA (the Swedish group that is) song “money, money, money” and maybe that’s the reason…..

L F Cassar
L F Cassar
19 days ago

If the MSS was worth its salt, it should be investigating this fellow’s bank accounts and his alliances, as well as wire-tapping his phone. But in Malta, the mafia’s tentacles are too widespread!

Karistu
Karistu
14 days ago

He must be very rich by now.

Related Stories

Health Ministry to spend another €1.7 million as Paola hospital remains closed
The Health Ministry has recently issued contracts worth €1.7
Opinion: Get it together, Robert
The Shift should thank the prime minister for saying

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo