WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange finally freed

WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange, who has unjustly spent years in prison for publishing leaked information exposing war crimes and human rights abuses, is set to be freed after reaching a plea deal with the United States.

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said it was hugely relieved by his release, a victory for press freedom and the culmination of a years-long campaign for justice.

According to WikiLeaks, Assange left Belmarsh high-security prison in London on the morning of 24 June after spending 1,901 days there awaiting the outcome of extradition proceedings initiated by the United States.

He was granted bail at the High Court in London and then taken to Stansted Airport, where he boarded a plane to leave the UK. He is expected to reunite in Australia with his wife, Stella Assange, and their children – who have never met him outside jail.

Details of the plea deal have yet to be released, but Assange is expected to plead guilty to one charge – rather than the 18 he would have faced had he been extradited for trial in the US – and the five years he has already served in Belmarsh prison should be taken into account.

RSF Director of Campaigns Rebecca Vincent said, “We are hugely relieved that Julian Assange is finally free – a long overdue victory for journalism and press freedom. He should never have spent a single day deprived of his liberty for publishing information in the public interest. Nothing can undo the past 13 years, but it is never too late to do the right thing, and we welcome this move by the US government.”

Assange, an Australian citizen, was facing up to 175 years in prison on 18 counts related to WikiLeaks’ publication in 2010 of more than 250,000 leaked classified military and diplomatic documents.

He would have been the first publisher to be tried under the US Espionage Act, which would have set a deeply alarming precedent threatening any journalist or media organisation working with leaked classified information.

His release comes after a huge and years-long global campaign emphasising the grave danger for journalism and press freedom such a prosecution would pose.

RSF has been central to that campaign and is the only NGO to have monitored more than four years of extradition proceedings against Assange in UK courts. RSF representatives also gained rare access to visit Assange in Belmarsh prison and advocated directly with the US, UK, and Australian governments, urging them to find a political solution to the case.

While the campaign’s success brings enormous relief to his family, supporters and journalists worldwide, it is deeply alarming that Assange was deprived of his liberty for 13 years –  including more than five years in Belmarsh prison and almost seven taking refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London – for publishing material that was both true and of enormous public interest.

The expectation is that, under the plea deal, Assange will plead guilty to a single criminal count of conspiring to obtain and disclose classified US national defence documents, a charge under the Espionage Act which could still have a chilling effect on public interest journalism and the public’s right to know. In addition, there has still been no accountability for the crimes exposed in the leaked documents.

On a personal level, Assange’s incarceration has taken a huge toll on his mental and physical health.

Extradition proceedings in the UK had been expected to continue in the High Court in London on 9-10 July, following a decision in May to grant him the right to appeal his 2022 extradition order on two grounds, both related to the possibility that, as an Australian citizen, he could be denied free speech protections afforded by the First Amendment. UK judges had said he had a “real prospect of success” on those grounds.


Sign up to our newsletter

Stay in the know

Get special updates directly in your inbox
Don't worry we do not spam
Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
A. Fan
A. Fan
20 days ago

The ‘public’s right to know’ is not, and never can be, absolute. Intelligence operations are not conducted and wars are not fought in the media or through public debate. Access to sensitive national security information must always be curtailed, but in a balanced manner.

In the Assange case, a valid example was ultimately set for would-be violators of the Espionage Act without unnecessary further retribution on him. Fault was acknowledged and leniency was extended in return.

How do you think the case would have ended had the secrets leaked been those of Russia, Iran, North Korea, or any other autocratic state? Quickly and quietly, is the short answer. So let’s also be balanced in passing judgment on how we got here.

Paul berman
Paul berman
20 days ago
Reply to  A. Fan

Is the USA an autocratic state? It has killed an immense number of innocent civilians across the world with complete impunity and continues to do so. The latest report Camileri occurred when 3 US soldiers died in Jordan the response was 64 missile strikes in Iraq.

A. Fan
A. Fan
20 days ago
Reply to  Paul berman

Sadly, the US is well on it’s way to autocratic rule if Trump gets elected again in November. Thus far, however, local and national leaders have been chosen through free elections; although much of the country suffers from the same problem as Malta, i.e. pitiful lack of general reasoning skills and comprehesion due to deficient education.

As to collateral damage in US military operations, can you please quantify ‘immense’ for me; and contrast that total against the death toll that would have resulted had the US not been involved? It’s always easy to jeer the players from the cheap seats when you have no actual skin in the game.

Have there been some bad actors in the US military? Of course. Do their forces make mistakes? Of course they do. BUT, would you rather have the Russians, Iranians, Chinese, North Koreans, et al. filling the vacuum if the US decided to isolate itself once again (as Trump is threatening to do)?

Ask yourself: what would Europe look like today had Wilson and Roosevelt opted to simply watch from the sidelines? Hardly better than present day reality, but residing in the periphery of the Third Reich, you’d probably be too well brainwashed to even realize that.

Related Stories

Roberta Metsola appointed European President with highest ever vote
Roberta Metsola has been re-elected European Parliament President with
Court orders Stagno Navarra to pay his lawyer’s bills
Labour propagandist Karl Stagno Navarra was found guilty of

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo