Elderly homes residents find bank accounts closed after due diligence exercises

Several elderly bank account holders, particularly those of Bank of Valletta, have had their life-line banking facilities abruptly shut down after failing to attend due diligence meetings with bank officials.

A number of individuals, including residents of homes for the elderly who have been secluded indoors for years, have been informed that their banking facilities were being suspended or even shut down after they failed to answer letters and phone calls from bank officials to set up meetings to “check their accounts”.

Family members of vulnerable residents in their 90s complained to The Shift that their relatives, some with dementia, have suddenly found that they cannot receive their monthly pensions or even spend small amounts from their own accounts because their banking facilities have been either suspended or completely shut down.

“Although it is good that, after the transgressions we have seen, the banks are finally taking due diligence and money laundering seriously, it is unbelievable that they are targeting the small fries and the vulnerable just to tick the regulatory due diligence requirement boxes,” a man whose 95-year-old father had his bank account closed down told The Shift.

“My father has not been out of his old people’s home for years. How is he expected to go to the bank and give them details of how much funds he has and where they came from?” he questioned.

Banks are seen to be pulling their socks up after Malta was grey-listed by the Financial Action Task Force over the lax controls and surveillance of the financial system on the part of the authorities including the FIAU and the Malta Financial Services Authority.

Another son of a home for the elderly resident, who is over 60 years of age himself, complained that his elderly mother had not even read the letter she received asking her to attend a meeting with her ‘banking monitor’.

“Still her funds were frozen and she is panicking that she can’t even withdraw €10. This is not fair, especially when considering that these people have held accounts at the same bank for decades and only use it for their pensions. Are the banks doing this so that they reduce their costs from non-profitable accounts?” he asked.

Contacted by The Shift, a Bank of Valletta spokesperson confirmed that such exercises are ongoing but refuted claims that they are being done sporadically and with utter disregard for the vulnerability of certain clients.

Confirming that “all account holders are subject to due diligence reviews”, the spokesperson said that this “may be due to account activity which is not in line with the customer’s profile in view that customer behaviour changes over time, or because of expired  or outdated documentation.”

Asked whether the bank could be more sensitive and discerning when it comes to such exercises, the bank said that “the process is not random and is driven by a number of factors which include the risk profile, account activity and nature of documentation held”.

The Shift is informed that other banks are adopting similar tactics, although to a lesser extent.

All of Malta’s major banks have been fined by the Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit for lax oversight in which hundreds of millions of euros were allegedly laundered through the Maltese banking system over the years.

Banks are pulling their socks up after Malta was grey-listed by the Financial Action Task Force over the lax controls and surveillance of the financial system on the part of the authorities including the FIAU and the Malta Financial Services Authority.

                           

Sign up to our newsletter

Stay in the know

Get special updates directly in your inbox
Don't worry we do not spam
                           
                               
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
viv
viv
1 year ago

Clearly the suits have gone completely mad.

Michael Borg
1 year ago

Banks need to use COMMON SENSE which apparently it is not so COMMON FOR THEM.


Philip
Philip
1 year ago

In an age where cdd can be done on a recorded video conference and save these elderly people in homes going to a branch. Bov still seems to live in the medieval ages. Time to move on with time bov.

Last edited 1 year ago by Philip
abela
abela
1 year ago

bank of valletta want to move everyone to revolut and such. they dont want any private citizen as client and want to focus on business clients only.

jingo
jingo
1 year ago
Reply to  abela

Business clients? Who in his right mind is going to employ someone to handle the correspondence with a bank? Since the grey listing, they are acting holier than the pope. In the meantime they are losing business.

Annie
Annie
1 year ago

BOV is a shocking bank, used to have them for company business and they started charging me for having too much money in a business account!
They should have moved their fat a55 and visited their customers in their place of residence.

Ramon
Ramon
1 year ago

Confirming that “all account holders are subject to due diligence reviews”, the spokesperson said that this “may be due to account activity which is not in line with the customer’s profile in view that customer behaviour changes over time, or because of expired or outdated documentation.”

Where the account activity is not in line with profile, it may be understandable, if the said activity is on the high side.

However if it’s about expired documentation this is ridiculous. The expired documentation was NOT expired or invalid at the time it was collected. If a person was successfully identified with a valid ID at the time of opening, the date of birth did not change, the gender did not change, the name and surname still stick around. Yes, a few wrinkles here and there. However, this is an exaggeration.
Its about bank collecting info for the authorities with perfect identity info JUST IN CASE action needs to be taken against them. For people on the low risk risk, identity info need not be collected every few years. Perhaps every 15 or 20 years.

D. Borg
D. Borg
1 year ago

Guess the FIAU and BoV may have happily ticked all the CDD boxes for Dr. Muscat and his “consultancy income flows”, and likewise Dr. Mizzi’s family assets populating achievements…..let alone the a certain “Gaddafi” funds.

Carmelo pace hasan
Carmelo pace hasan
1 year ago

I think all banks have copies of our ID cards so all know our age. We need more respect. Nowadays we are just a number. The banks have forgotten that the money in their safes is our savings from hard work. We used to save money for tomorrow.
Some of the younger generation with their money buy nice cars and do not save it.

Kurt
Kurt
1 year ago

About time this bank started taking due diligence seriously after taking on the customers that other banks did not want.

Richard azzopardi
Richard azzopardi
1 year ago

We should keep cash in hand and forget about banking,no matter what the people running the world say, a cheque is a piece of paper and money in the bank’s is just digit numbers.cash is cash so stick to it.the problem to keep the money is not for uss that maybe we get close to 50 or 100 thousand by the time of our death.the problem is for those that get millions income monthly……….

makjavel
makjavel
1 year ago

BOV is trying to prove itself to be a VIRGIN, after the mess in the Electrogas millions that were passed out as bank guarantees on the order of Muscat. So it attacks the senior citizens not the senior fraudsters of the nation.

Maryann Zahra
Maryann Zahra
1 year ago

Cash is CASH and it means FREEDOM

Related Stories

Xewkija mayor drops case against land grab by her father’s canvasser
Simona Refalo, the 19-year-old newly elected Labour mayor of
Government to legalise abusive use of GWU’s Valletta HQ
The government has presented a parliamentary resolution to legalise

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo