Tribunal slams government CEO on secret elderly homes contracts

The Shift won a significant challenge in favour of transparency and accountability as the Information and Data Protection Appeals Tribunal upheld its request for a copy of the multi-million-euro direct contracts the government is awarding for the lease of beds at private homes for the elderly.

Two years after the Freedom of Information request was filed, the Tribunal condemned the government for being economical with the truth, ordering the Health and Active Ageing Ministry, led by Jo Etienne Abela, to make the multiple contracts, costing taxpayers over €50 million a year, available to The Shift.

In a strongly worded decision, Tribunal Chair Anna Mallia slammed the government CEO behind these direct orders, Renzo Degabriele, for trying to keep important information away from the public, saying the CEO’s arguments were not credible.

The Tribunal referred in particular to the Active Ageing CEO’s declarations, in which Degabriele said that if he had to release these documents, he would not be able to negotiate the best possible price and value for money for taxpayers.

Slamming Degabriele’s argument, the Tribunal Chair said that if the CEO wanted to be credible, he should refrain from signing contracts through direct orders and instead issue tenders so that “everyone could compete” and the government could have the best possible service with a competitive price.

“This is not happening as the CEO is insisting on direct orders,” the Tribunal noted.

The Shift’s request was made in 2022 following an investigation which found that the government was not following any established rules when entering into multi-million-euro contracts with the owners of private homes, primarily well-connected development contractors.

All contracts for the lease of long-term beds for the elderly are signed by Degabriele in complete secrecy, and rates and conditions are negotiated directly between ministry officials and the private owners of individual residences. This has resulted in a hotchpotch of conditions and contracts.

According to an NAO audit, the government is paying €120 a day for each bed in one home while another receives just €65 a day for the same service.

Also, while the budget allocated to this scheme was somewhat restricted until a few years ago – at around €9 million in 2016 – it has now ballooned to over €50 million a year, with the government buying most of the beds provided by the private sector.

In certain cases, such as the homes controlled by developer Paul Attard of the former GAP contractors, the government ‘buys’ all the beds at his residences, with millions paid every year through direct orders.

While the private homes enter into a deal to lease their beds, the ministry chooses who on the waiting list is selected to be given a bed and at which home.

The Tribunal ordered the ministry and Degabriele to make the contracts available for scrutiny in 20 days.

                           

Sign up to our newsletter

Stay in the know

Get special updates directly in your inbox
Don't worry we do not spam
                           
                               
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KLAUS
KLAUS
22 hours ago

👏👏👏👏👏

Cikku
Cikku
10 hours ago

a company, notary, accountant or any subject person caught not following AML regulations is brought to justice, even when the breach is limited to lack of updated due diligence and no one has been robbed of anything material. that subject person is barely left with the energy to live another day.

A government minister, a government agency ceo or official, caught breaching public procurement regulations at the cost of public coffers, continue with their daily lives committing the same breaches. here there breaches are two fold – breach of public procurement regulations and mismanagement/theft of public funds.

low and behold our police force and the office of the attorney general are both silent and incapable of taking any action. Where is the FCID with their top secret offices in st venera/hamrun? Is it also incapacitated?

paul pullicino
paul pullicino
10 hours ago

Only Labour can do this. Taxpayer millions direct ordered to private developers who invest in beds in homes rented out to government and the minister through his “customer care staff” choose who gets the state funded beds. The party wins, the developer wins…even financially.

Mark
Mark
9 minutes ago

On this issue can the minister concerned explain how people are selected to be sent to Private Old People Homes using Government paid beds? Or the Shift can investigate? Are people selected after an established and transparent process ? Or the friends/relatives of ‘important people’ are selected. Rumours are rife about a particular Old people’s home in Sliema. but of course these might be just rumours.

Related Stories

European Court of Human Rights blasts Malta’s detention regime, again
The European Court of Human Rights had extremely harsh
Objection filed as Bonnici Brothers snatch latest tender from Wasteserv
A call for the revision of a €4.6 million

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo