‘Serious corporate governance issues’ uncovered at tourism zone foundation

“Serious corporate governance issues” and a total disregard for Public Procurement Regulations have been found at the Foundation for Tourism Zone Development, an audit of its operations in 2021 has found.

Over 2021, around 22 individuals had been given a “relatively short” contract for service with the Foundation at a total cost of over €206,000, the National Audit Office found.

Moreover, the work was awarded without any calls for expressions of interest, and the agreements were “repeatedly renewed” upon expiration.

Such agreements covered maintenance services, beach supervision as well as office and liaison office duties.

The Foundation for Tourism Zones Development is funded by the tourist tax introduced in 2016 and does maintenance and cleansing work in designated tourism zones.

In the assessment of its operations, internal controls were found to be severely lacking, “indicating that little or no monitoring was in place to ensure efficient financial management”.

2021’s €370,000 upgrading of the Xemxija promenade, a project that had been overrun by 12%, was singled out as a case in point.

An audit of the project found Public Procurement Regulations were ignored entirely.

For starters, every procurement sampled by the NAO, irrespective of the amount involved, was carried out by direct contract and without the approval of the right level of authority as required by standing regulations when purchasing from the open market.

At times, procurement of homogenous items was split into a number of batches “to intentionally circumvent the issue of a public call for tenders”.

While the service provider carrying out upgrading works at the Xemxija promenade was “hand-picked,” the NAO noted the provider was still expected to supply a quote for the costs of each phase of the project for the purchase order to be raised accordingly.

But in three out of nine instances assessed, related quotations were not traced, and it could not be ascertained on what basis the purchase orders – worth €22,519 excluding VAT – had been drawn up.

Moreover, the NAO found the chairman’s endorsement for the direct orders was given by initialising them “without disclosing the date” – rendering it impossible to determine whether authorisation had been given before the direct orders were placed.

The NAO found that over 2021, several posts, including those in headship positions, were vacant and the Foundation was “basically relying on employees seconded from other government entities and directorates, and the engagement of personnel through a contract for service”.

Although the Foundation was established in 2015, by mid-September 2022, the only annual audited accounts presented were those for the 2019 financial year – in breach of the Foundation’s statute, which stipulated audited accounts were to be submitted to the tourism minister each June.

As disclosed in the management accounts for the year 2021, the Foundation reported a total income of €1,378,368, including a €1 million annual allocation provided by the Central Government.

Meanwhile, total expenditure for 2021 totalled €2,051,881, resulting in a net deficit for the year of €673,513.

                           

Sign up to our newsletter

Stay in the know

Get special updates directly in your inbox
Don't worry we do not spam
                           
                               
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KLAUS
KLAUS
1 year ago

Our Government. Always:
We are not interested. We just keep doing what we’re doing.
It’s always worked out well and has been very worthwhile.
Poor Malta.

Francis Said
Francis Said
1 year ago

And this is the typical of good and transparent governance applicable in Malta, by the PL government!!!!

Mick
Mick
1 year ago

Aw c’mon, they’re on full tilt to bring in the “quality tourists” they seem to think are just out there. Time they brought the Gozo beach cleaners over, they’re experts after all the overtime they generated getting Gozo pristine. No one wants a “headship position” can you blame them? It would mean having to come in and sign on or clock in somewhere or even possibly meet someone in charge (if there is someone in charge). Attendance drops on the last Friday of the month as everyone heads to the bank to check their wages tally with the “mickey mouse” hours they’ve submitted. Judging by the article it would appear to me that the Maltese crew were trained in Gozo and picked up some of their tricks.
HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL YOU PEOPLE UP THERE KEEP UP THE PRESSURE

Joseph Tabone Adami
Joseph Tabone Adami
1 year ago

From the looks of it 2021 was not a ‘happy’ year as regards accounting for expenditure of public money now, was it!

This is the third instance we are informed of regarding recklessness and lack of accountability by Government departments in administering the funds allotted to them through the Budget for that year.

First we heard of the largesse of 1 million Euros ‘distributed’ by the Gozo Ministry among 800 employees for phantom overtime remuneration.

Next we had that in the way unauthorized allowances and overtime payments for some of the Foreign Ministry staff were made.

Now this scandal at the tourism zone foundation.

What next?

Mick
Mick
1 year ago

No worries it won’t be far away, Mafialand, a scandal a day keeps the truth at bay.

Paul Bonello
Paul Bonello
1 year ago

The fish rots from its head. The Minister for Tourism signs a five year commercial deal with Manchester United and pretends a god-given right not to disclose the sum involved to us taxpayers. And the Prime Minister condones and allows such dismal governance. Transparency my foot!

Joseph
Joseph
1 year ago
Reply to  Paul Bonello

The stench is nauseating

Jack
Jack
1 year ago

It would be interesting to know who was the Minister in charge and who were the beneficiaries of the direct orders.

Related Stories

Court rules Siggiewi land used as quarry by Polidano to be returned to public
The Court of Appeal has ruled that a sizeable
Four chiefs in four months while health sector procurement faces delays
The government’s Central Procurement and Supplies Unit (CPSU), one

Our Awards and Media Partners

Award logo Award logo Award logo